Newsletter – October 2026

A person standing at a podium

Description automatically generated

It’s been another busy month in payments. Gloomy forecasts were balanced with interesting new fundraises, continued investment in European payment sovereignty, strong growth (but little revenue) in Open Banking and pretty much every PSP launching merchant cash advance (MCA).

The Payments business

Are the good times over? The consultants certainly think so. BCG’s latest predictions for the payment industry make sobering reading as we reach a critical inflection point. The consultants see payments revenue growth in Europe decelerating from 10% to 5% over the next five years.

Bar graph depicting payments revenue in Europe in billions of dollars for 2019, 2025, and 2030, showing transaction-related and non-transaction related revenue, with CAGR values labeled.

The analysts do highlight some bright spots. Europe still benefits from faster growing markets such as Poland and Czechia, from ever increasing use of contactless to replace cash and the resilience of high-margin, cross border transactions. Set against this, cash-to-digital conversion is pretty much complete in some mature markets while intense competition is driving down margins and profitability, notably for enterprise clients and for software-led distribution.

What should the industry do? It’s clear that today’s successful acquirers and PSPs are technology companies with the ability to ship new products at speed on modern platforms and/or deepen client relationships through vertical business management software. Neither is an easy transformation for legacy players with a heritage in banking.

And many of these are too busy sorting out their platforms to match the speed to market of Stripe and the other new players. Fiserv’s new CEO told investors: “We have 14 gateways, 13 don’t need to exist but they are hard to unwind. We have 24 Visa and Mastercard routers/switches. There should only be one. The challenge is shutting down half is easy; the other half takes time.” (quoted by Cleveland Research)

With market growth slowing, there is evidence that general valuations are shrinking too. BCG observes that “a payments company can now grow at 20% annually, post 50% EBITDA margins, and still trade at only 12 times forward EV/EBITDA.”


Paradoxically, it’s been a busy month for fundraising. Europeans with good payment ideas are still very investable, especially when they can add some AI-spin to their story.

  • Manchester-based Ryft raised £20m to expand into continental Europe. Ryft competes with Mangopay and Lemonway as an independent PSP for complex merchants such as marketplaces.
  • Cellpoint Digital, a payment orchestrator founded in 2007, has raised $34m to fund its new “AI decisioning platform,” taking its total capital raised to $144m. London-HQ’d Cellpoint’s 2024 accounts show revenues of $5.1m and an operating loss of $19m. Cellpoint specialises in hotels and airlines.
  • Zeal, also based in London, claims to be “the world’s #1 VAS solution on payment terminals” and announced a $10m fundraising round although it refused to name the investors. Zeal offers card-linking loyalty apps on Ingenico, Verifone and Sunmi Terminals. This is a notoriously difficult sector within which to establish a viable business.Share

Returning to the established winners. Stripe has profited from its strong position with the fast-growing AI sector. Its developer-focused APIs, global coverage and metered billing capability make it very attractive to start-ups in the sector. However, once merchants get to a certain size, they are still likely to dual-source.

Adyen announced last month that OpenAI is now a customer while Anthropic, makers of Claude, has started building its own payment infrastructure. This seems entirely reasonable for a business with $45bn of sales. Anthropic has hired 544 people from the payment industry, 335 of them from Stripe.

A screenshot of a computer

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Source: Rohit Doshi

Dwayne Gefferie has a good analysis of what it takes for PSPs to win AI merchants from Stripe. It won’t be easy but there are opportunities for those with strong coverage in certain geographies or expertise in fighting trial and multi-account abuse.

Adyen looks to have displaced Shift4 as Flatpay’s strategic payments infrastructure partner. Shift4 has powered Flatpay’s acquiring since its early days, but the new agreement gives Adyen responsibility for acquiring and financial infrastructure across existing and new markets. This includes instant settlement, cash advances, business accounts and card issuing. Neither company has said what happens to the existing Shift4 portfolio of over 100,000 SMB merchants in seven markets.

Checkout.com has become a serious competitor to Stripe and Adyen for enterprise digital merchants. Checkout is privately held offshore and doesn’t publish its accounts. This has sometimes led to confusion when people have tried to read too much into official filings from its UK business. This year, Checkout helpfully published a selective list of group KPIs which fall well short of audited financial statements but give some insight into its performance.

Total payment volume is forecast at $480bn for 2026, up 60% on the previous year. Revenue is running at $750m annualised although we don’t know what that calculation is based upon. And the business expects to make $150m “adjusted EBITDA” in 2026. We don’t know what the adjustments are. The numbers look great, but it would be nice to get some consistency.


If any player can match the Stipe, Adyen and Checkout for product development, it’s probably Revolut. The London-based bank is making strides in merchant services, piloting face-based payments in three London cafes. You tap “pay with smile” on the terminal which compares your face with the image captured when you opened your Revolut account. If it matches, the transaction goes through as “on us” at no cost to the merchant.

This isn’t yet a serious proposition but underlines the potential of Revolut linking its consumer and SME customers with new business models.

In the UK, Lloyds Cardnet – the bank’s JV with Fiserv – returned to growth in 2025 after a difficult few years. Volume was up 10% at £57bn. Read more on the Business of Payments blog

Bar chart showing Lloyds Cardnet transaction volume in billions (£) and revenue per transaction from 2020 to 2025, with data for debit and credit transactions and net fee income indicated.

In other bank news, BPCE, the second largest banking group in France, has brought its payment businesses together in a single unit, called (wait for it…) BPCE Merchant Services. This includes Payplug, an omni-channel PSP that processed €11bn in 2025. BPCE is aiming to grow its market share from 25% to 30% by 2030. Banks that buy Fintechs often kill them so BPCE deserves praise for supporting and growing Payplug. Indeed, Antoine Grimaud – founder of Payplug – will oversee the enlarged business. In the video, a happy customer explains why her business uses Payplug.

In corporate news, Nayax, the Israeli unattended payment specialist listed on NASDAQ, has spent $350m buying IPS, which supplies “smart parking technology” around the world. In Europe, IPS is active in UK and Ireland. There’s more money in parking than you might think. IPS will generate $90m revenues this year. The sale price is 17x EBITDA.

NMI also has a strong position in parking and other unattended payments. It was a delight to make a presentation to its customers and partners while spending an afternoon cruising down the River Thames

A speaker stands at a podium with microphones, presenting in front of a backdrop featuring the logo of 'nmi'.

MPE, 9-11 March 2027

It’s that time again, folks. Merchant Payments Ecosystem is open for bookings for next year’s conference. It’s the best event in Europe and you can get a 30% discount for buying your tickets early. 

Merchant payment ecosystem | MPE 2027

Payment sovereignty

In the UK, a consortium of banks is raising money to form a new company, called DeliveryCo, which will deliver “the next generation of retail payments infrastructure.” The press described the initiative as creating a British alternative to Visa and Mastercard but DeliveryCo is actually tasked with modernising the existing inter-bank payment system. Mike Chambers explains how it will work.

An image featuring the text 'Meet DeliveryCo' with a blue and black color scheme, accompanied by an illustration of a blue pipe being lifted by a crane above a gray pipe. The background includes a faint silhouette of London landmarks.

A cynic would say that the new business will most likely start (and possibly finish) by buying Vocalink – the organisation that runs Faster Payments, BACS and CHAPS – from Mastercard, which is known to be looking to exit its £700m acquisition.

On the continent, work continues with wero, a wallet that sits on top of SEPA Instant Payments, and the digital euro. Wero will be available in France, Germany, Austria and the Benelux. In the rest of Europe, the national champions have recognised the need for cross-border interoperability and have formed a new organisation called the European Network for Payments to make this a reality. ENP (or ENfP, nobody knows yet) is based in Madrid and brings wero together with Bizum (Spain), SIBS (Portugal) and Bancomat (Italy). Blik, the Polish mobile standard, has its own international ambitions and remains outside for the moment.

The ECB is moving forward with the digital euro and looking for pilot merchants. If your customers include staff working for the ECB or national central banks (maybe you run the staff restaurant or the gym next door), just sign this 12-page end-user agreement and speak to one of the 36 PSPs selected for the pilot.

#Werowatch

EPI, parent company of wero, expects 2,000 merchants to be live by the end of October. We’re seeing a regular stream of announcements of some of Europe’s largest brands adding wero to their checkout pages, including Fnac Darty in France and dm drug stores in Germany.

A screenshot of a phone

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

One German retailer described his experience with wero on LinkedIn, saying the integration took about one day of coding and they were now receiving a steady flow of orders using wero.

One proven way to get people to try a new payment method is to bribe them. Wero ran a remarkable promotion in Germany, offering €15 to anyone making their first two transactions (or P2P payment of just 1 cent) with wero. Unsurprisingly, this proved very popular with one user posting: “€15 for 10 seconds of work and a 2-cent transfer to friends (1 cent each is enough).

Dutch retailers are not so happy. Wero will replace iDEAL, a very popular and cheap payment method for online purchases in the Netherlands. Wero includes more features, such as consumer protection, and many merchants will pay more.

Wero hasn’t been cheap to build. According to Finanz-Szene, the EPI has already received €754m investment from participating banks and issued a further €85m in shares in July. This coincided with the extension of wero to Austria with Erste Bank, Raiffeisen Bank International and three Raiffeisen Landesbanken joining EPI.

Despite the flurry of positive stories, we don’t have any concrete news about the number of wero transactions. For sovereignty and resilience, this may not much matter. Once wero is widely accepted, it becomes a viable alternative to international cards if or when needed.

Agentic Commerce

Agentic commerce is moving so fast that it’s hard for anyone to keep up.

So far, there seems little enthusiasm from consumers to trust AI to spend their money although trust in agents’ product recommendations seems to be growing. For the moment, we still need a “confirm” button pressed by a human although this could change quickly with the launch of the latest AI personal assistants.

Meta has released Muse while the cool kids in the Valley are raving about Instinct. Both personal assistants use Stripe’s Link product to make payments. See how it works.Link asks consumers to validate transactions, so this isn’t pure agentic commerce. But it’s really easy and is likely to grow rapidly into 2027.

These assistants are expensive to provide so it’s no surprise that Meta says it would like to monetise the service by charging merchants a fee. The problem is that any attempt to limit Muse to only shop at participating merchants would compromise its independence and make Muse less interesting to shoppers.

It’s likely that agents will use cards rather than anything more novel (although GoCardless has demonstrated an agentic A2A payment) but there are a number of outstanding questions. Notably, who is liable in the event of an agent making a mistake. Clue: it’s not Stripe. The latest terms and conditions make this very clear.

A close-up of a white background

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Embedded payments and finance

Europe lags behind the US in adopting embedded payments – a software vendor including payment processing in a tightly integrated bundle with its core product. Flagship Consulting estimates 20-40% of European payments are software-led, compared to over 60% in North America. One reason for the slower adoption in Europe is the fragmented nature of our software industry; ISVs are often too small to absorb the capital cost of setting up a payment business. This may leave the door open to well-funded American giants to dominate Europe in the next few years.

Certainly, it’s the large PSPs that are making most progress in this sector. Stripe and Adyen dominate the embedded payments market in Europe according to new research from APIdeck.

Beyond payments, ISVs are increasingly interested in offering loans to their merchants and are widely distributing merchant cash advance (MCA) products. This month Dojo announced it had passed £2bn total capital advanced by YouLend and was adding Liberis as a second supplier. The first billion took four years; the second less than two. In the video, a happy shopkeeper explains how he’s taken eight loans from Dojo/YouLend. 

Stripe uses YouLend in Europe but has just bought Parafin, a US embedded finance vendor which has lent $3bn to over 60,000 small businesses. I would expect Stripe to bring this capability to Europe.

William Jalloul, founder of Flowpay, an MCA vendor based in Prague, has given an interview to Sifted. Flowpay will launch in Germany and the UK but struggles with VCs back home. “We always raise 10x less than companies in western Europe,” he says. “If you compare us with the US, it’s 20x less on average. That’s pretty hard starting out.”

Tipping

One consequence of the explosion of American POS software in Europe is the export of its aggressive tipping culture to countries with very different habits. In Belgium, Adyen says 39% of people now leave a tip when prompted. This would have been unthinkable a few years ago.

What could go wrong? Shake Shack got into trouble after sharp-eyed customers revealed that self-service ordering kiosks raised prices for people that didn’t leave a tip. You might ask why a self-service kiosk needs tipping. This is America. Even robots won’t work without a cash incentive.

Fraud

The schemes are busy bulking their anti-fraud capabilities. Visa has bought BioCatch, which provides behavioural biometrics for $2.4bn. BioCatch analyses how you swipe and hold your phone to decide if you are really you. This feels slightly creepy but gives merchants fraud detection before shoppers have even hit the “buy” button.

This summer’s World Cup has taught Americans a lesson in cross-border commerce. Many legitimate transactions were blocked by systems set up to refuse the last minute, high-value purchases with unusual behavioural patterns typical of football supporters.

VAMP, the new Visa fraud-reduction programme, is beginning to bite. One US retailer has been hit with an $8 surcharge for each dispute raised until they reduce fraud and chargeback ratios.

In legal news, Nuvei has paid $4.9m to settle an FTC lawsuit alleging that it processed payments for merchants engaged in scams. One customer “was impersonating Microsoft with fake virus alerts and luring consumers to offshore call centers under the guise of offering remote tech support services.” This underlines, yet again, the importance of knowing what your merchants are doing.

Can love blossom when he’s all anxious about …. Card fraud? Watch this new “mini drama” from Mastercard in Korea.

Open banking

Despite the adoption of open banking earlier this year by high-profile eCommerce merchants such as eBay and Amazon, UK transaction growth hasn’t accelerated. It’s stuck at c.30%. There’s a long way to go before A2A will be challenging debit cards.

Bar chart showing UK Open Banking Payments in millions from February to August. The blue bars represent total payments while the orange line indicates annual change percentage.

What’s holding back open banking? The industry has acknowledged the need for a business model and for consumer protection. That’s why banks and PSPs have founded the UK Payments Initiative with the aim of helping commercial variable recurring payments replace direct debits. This could be a tough ask. Direct debits are reliable, cheap and with remarkably high levels of customer satisfaction.

For open banking or any A2A payment method to succeed, we also need a relentless focus on customer experience – including transaction speed. Betclic Group, a French gaming business, targets 10 seconds from customer clicking to add to their account and the money arriving. Apple Pay can do 5 seconds. Bank transfers, often involving the user clicking through successive screens in a mobile banking app, can be much slower. Cards may be more expensive but higher conversion rates could make the cost still worthwhile.

In vendor news, TrueLayer, which claims to be Europe’s largest open banking player, reported operating losses of £36m on sales of just £28m in 2025, despite payment volume up 52% at £65bn. TrueLayer is a great business, but this brings further confirmation that there’s little money in A2A payments. Read more on the Business of Payments blog.

Truelayer sells direct to merchants. This is expensive. In contrast, Yapily, an open banking vendor which has followed a low-cost business model of indirect sales via Fintech’s reported its first year of profitability. Yapily may never be a unicorn but it’s now a viable business and that deserves congratulations.

Bar chart illustrating Yapily's turnover and operating losses from 2022 to 2025. The blue bars represent turnover, while the gray bars indicate operating losses.

In Sweden, Trustly raised a further $40m to “turn payments into intelligence that helps businesses win new customers.” Trustly says the cash will accelerate its AI-powered growth strategy, but the timing (and 200 layoffs) suggests the money will also provide some welcome balance-sheet support.

Trustly’s underlying economics show the pressure the sector is under. Q2 payment volume rose 26% but revenue increased just 6%, gross profit fell 13% and adjusted EBITDA halved. Trustly has been consistently one of the best performing A2A vendors in Europe but it’s a tough sector in which to make money.

In a rare legal victory for PSPs, a Madrid court found against ING Bank for misusing open banking APIs. The bank had accepted transactions and then later rejected them for insufficient funds. Which is the anonymous PSP that continued the case to conclusion over five years? My money is on Lyra, whose CEO published a blog complaining about ING’s APIs back in 2022.

Share

Crypto corner

Stablecoins have dominated industry conferences for several years yet there’s little sign yet of mass-market adoption by merchants. Christoper Uriarte from Glenbrook attended Checkout’s client conference and reported that “everyone is talking about stablecoins but don’t always know what to do with them.”

I questioned the consumer need for stablecoins in a LinkedIn post. Cue a lively debate and 85.000 impressions. I was backed up by a new study by the Bank of Italy which shows that stablecoins are no cheaper for moving money than traditional channels.

Stablecoins need to overcome the reputational damage of their association with crypto. And it’s true that Tether (known as USDT) remains the coin of choice for criminals, terrorists and fraudsters. According to a US Senate report, Tether “became a primary cryptocurrency for Iran, Hamas, Hizballah, and the Houthis beginning in 2023 and has expanded in scale since.” The reasons are obvious. As Jason Mikula explains “the ability to create near limitless, anonymous wallets and to move funds effectively instantaneously and irreversibly have made crypto a favoured financial mechanism for bad actors

This is one of the problems OpenUSD hopes to solve. This is a fee-free stablecoin issued by a consortium of well-known names including Stripe, Visa and Mastercard who, we hope, would build AML and KYC into their product from day one. Simon Taylor is very excited.

In other news

A legal definition written in 2009 could accidentally dismantle Europe’s gift-card market. A major lobbying effort is underway to stop merchants being obliged to become EMIs to accept pre-paid Visa or Mastercards. Expect a solution involving changing scheme rules.

Flatpay has released a fun new commercial. It features Kevin Magnusson, a Danish racing driver who holds the Formula One record for the most career starts without leading a lap.

Prosus, the South African eCommerce conglomerate and owner of PayU, has published a detailed review of the use of AI agents by its operating companies. It makes fascinating reading.

A graph with numbers and a line

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Despite its leadership in many fields of technology, the US still uses magnetic stripes on cards issued to benefit claimants. Romanian gangs have noticed and have stolen millions of dollars from poor people.

A LinkedIn influencer asks why Mollie’s CEO never posts. Mollie’s founder (who does post quite a lot on LinkedIn) says his CEO doesn’t have time.

In a bizarre “pro-growth” measure, the UK scrapped the £100 legal limit for contactless transactions. No issuers have taken advantage of this largely pointless freedom.

Russian aggression hit a new low when a drone hit an Ingenico warehouse in Ukraine. Fortunately, nobody was hurt but just look at those terminals.

A large room with debris in it

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

And finally

For those following developments in the English Premier League….

Chat conversation with a customer service representative from Northgate Card Services, discussing disputed charges on a credit card statement.

Spotted on LinkedIn via James Hill

My investments

I’ve made small investments in three exciting payment start-ups. I’ve included these for full disclosure but let me know if you’d like an introduction.

· 1-CP – based in Frankfurt, 1-CP is the “Corporate PayPal” that brings B2B functions into merchants’ B2C checkouts.

· Equali – reconciliation and accounting automation for payments

· Inqyre – AI orchestration for merchant onboarding in payments

Where to find me

I’ll be at Open Banking Expo, London, 13 October; EPSM, Athens, 22 October; Mastercard Acquirer Innovation Forum, London, 3 December; MPE, Berlin, 9-11 March 2027; and Merchant Transact, London, 12 April 2027.

Get in touch

If you’re looking for a board advisor, non-executive director or speaker/moderator at a company event or conference, get in touch.

Book an online meeting or reach me the old-fashioned way: geoff@barracloughandco.com, +44 7808 142102.

TrueLayer: there’s not much money in moving money

Truelayer, the London-based open banking vendor, reported continued strong growth and firm cost control in 2025 but remains a long way from profitability. The business hasn’t yet convinced that A2A payments alone can support a viable business model.

Bar graph showing TrueLayer's turnover and operating loss in millions of pounds from 2020 to 2022.

Founded by Franceso Simoneschi in 2016, Truelayer is backed by a stellar roster of investors including Stripe, Tiger Global and Anthemis. It has received funding of $321m in total according to Crunchbase with its latest $130m round in 2021 valuing the business at $1bn. 

Truelayer says it is “Europe’s fastest growing Pay by Bank network” and trades with regulatory licences in London and Dublin. Management claims market leading positions in UK, Germany, Ireland and France. Truelayer recently bought Zimpler, a struggling Nordic open banking vendor, which expands its reach in that region and brings direct access to Swish, Sweden’s consumer A2A scheme.  

Total payment volume processed grew 52% to £65bn ($85bn) and management says it’s now running at an annualised rate of $150bn. This is impressive stuff.  Up until now, most of Truelayer’s business comes from Fintech (moving money into and out of investment accounts, paying credit card bills etc) and gaming (loading accounts at online casinos and payment of winnings.) This focus explains why Truelayer’s ATV, up 16% to £264, is much higher than typical retail eCommerce.  

Truelayer says enterprise merchants such as eBay and Amazon have begun offering open banking payments as an alternative to card payments for eCommerce transactions. Management expects “broader adoption to accelerate as enterprise merchants come to view it as a proven and scalable payment method” although, in the UK at least, there seems no acceleration yet in open banking payment growth. 

Bar chart displaying UK Open Banking Payments in millions from February to August, with a line graph showing the annual change percentage. Total payments are represented by blue bars, while the annual change is indicated by a dotted line with orange markers.

Revenue grew 39% to £28m in 2025. This is strong growth although the context is important. Against £65bn of payment volume, that represents an implied revenue yield of roughly 4bps, compared with perhaps 15–40bps for a typical merchant acquirer depending on its mix of SME and enterprise merchants. After direct costs, TrueLayer generated gross profit of just over 3bps of volume.  

Truelayer’s core problem is that open banking payments are low margin.

That is TrueLayer’s conundrum. Pay by Bank is attractive to merchants partly because it is much cheaper than cards. But you can’t undercut the card networks and acquirers on price and still expect to earn card-like margins. TrueLayer added $29bn of payment volume in 2025 while revenue increased by just £8m. Even at enormous scale, there simply isn’t very much money in moving the money.

The hope is that A2A payments is a low-margin anchor product on which more profitable businesses can be built. That’s why Truelayer has invested in new services to sell its customers around the transaction. These include payment-related products such as recurring transactions and one-click check-out but also identity verification and a move into lending with the acquisition of PayIn3, a Dutch BNPL specialist in Q2 2026.

Upselling customers high-margin value added services makes sense but, given Truelayer’s enterprise base, won’t be straightforward. These are sophisticated buyers that are comfortable multi-sourcing and good at negotiation. 

Returning to the 2025 accounts, administrative expenses fell 2% to £56m, suggesting some strong cost controls, and helping narrow the operating loss to £36m from £43m in 2024. Staff numbers have fallen from a peak of 434 in 2022 to an average of 235 in 2025.  The business is still burning cash – £28m outflow in 2025 – and raised an additional $25m from CDP Venture Capital, the Italian sovereign wealth fund, in June 2026. This is unlikely to be the last capital injection needed. Cumulative losses now stand at £268m.

Truelayer leads the open banking sector and is doing many things right. Volume and revenue are strongly up. Costs are flat. Cash burn is reducing and the brand is attracting marquee customers. With these results, the business demonstrates a credible route to profitability for the first time. However, this is critically dependent on proving it can sell additional, high-margin services to enterprise customers.. There’s simply not enough money in processing A2A payments alone to keep the show on the road. 

Lloyds Cardnet returns to growth

Lloyds Cardnet, the bank’s merchant services joint venture with Fiserv, returned to growth in 2025 although the recovery came at a price. Volume grew for the first time since 2020, cashflow was strong and the business was able to pay a dividend to its parents. But income per transaction fell sharply. 

Cardnet is owned 51% by Lloyds and 49% by Fiserv and mainly serves the bank’s business customers in the UK. The P&L is almost pure merchant acquiring. Technical costs are recharged to Fiserv which processes the transactions and provides gateway, terminals and Clover ePOS. People, sales and marketing costs are recharged to the bank. 

Following four years of declines, total processed volume rose 10% in 2025 to £57bn but sits well below the £66bn recorded in 2021. Management points to wins in food, drink, entertainment, retail and travel. Total transactions were up 18% but there is a long way to go to recover Cardnet’s previous position. Recent wins in the travel sector, notably Ryanair, should certainly help. So should new partnership deals with PayPoint and EPOS Now. However, Lloyds Bank’s new tie-up with Stripe for small business products suggests that the Cardnet JV may increasingly focus on enterprise merchants.

Bar chart illustrating Lloyds Cardnet transaction volume in billion pounds for debit and credit from 2020 to 2025, alongside a line graph showing net fee income per transaction.

Cardnet splits out debit and credit processing. Debit has caused most of the pain in recent years. Despite growing 9% in 2025 to £41bn, debit volumes are well below the peak of £54bn in 2021. In contrast, credit has performed much better and reached a record level of £16.5bn in 2025. 

Average transaction value fell 6% to £54. This explains why 18% transaction growth only delivered 10% volume growth. 

Line graph showing average transaction value in pounds for Lloyds Cardnet from 2020 to 2025, with separate lines for credit and debit transactions.

Despite the higher processed volumes, net fee and commission income grew just 2% to £54m. Cardnet’s unit margins continue to be squeezed, possibly by the addition of volume from large enterprise clients. Net fee income per transaction fell 13% to 5.1p. 

Margins were boosted by much improved settlement-related interest income which doubled to £6m. The bottom line was also helped by much lower fraud provisions which fell from £3.5m to £1.7m.

Good cost control saw total expenses falling 10% to £36m. This includes £17.8m recharged to Lloyds for salary and related costs, down 3% on the previous year and £11.5m towards Cardnet’s “strategic investment programme.” Fiserv received £15.4m, roughly in line with previous years. 

Bar chart showing Lloyds Cardnet's net income and profit before tax in millions of pounds from 2020 to 2025.

Profit before tax was up 51% to £23.7m. Having missed a payment in 2024, the JV was able to pay a dividend of £31m to its parents.

Cardnet is winning again. Volumes and transactions have returned to growth and there have been significant merchant wins. But it’s earning less from that activity: a very healthy 18% increase in transactions yielded just 2% more net fee income. Yet, profits rose strongly in 2025 as interest income, lower costs and lower fraud losses compensated for weaker acquiring economics.

Newsletter – September 2026

Business of Payments – September 2026

A person standing at a podium

Description automatically generated

It’s been a busy summer in the payment business as the major players gave their first half updates. They are telling a consistent story. Modern PSPs with developer-friendly technology are attracting the best, fastest-growing customers. The incumbents are left servicing the old economy and growing slowly, if at all.


Opportunities

I’ve been approached by investors looking to make acquisitions in the UK and Europe. Get in touch if you’re looking to sell either:

  • Payment gateway, ISO or small merchant acquirer with >€200m monthly volume
  • Retail or restaurant POS software with established merchant base

For a confidential introductory conversation, drop me an email: geoff@barracloughandco.com


The payment business

Stripe has continued it stunning success story. According to its August shareholder letter, it grew net revenue 41% in H1 2026. Stripe now processes for every single one of the 25 fastest growing software vendors and 44 of the Forbes AI 50. Blimey.

Payments remains the product anchor but Stripe is positioning itself as the infrastructure of the new economy. Stripe paid $8bn for OpenRouter, a platform which connects developers with AI models and which is growing at 9% per month. OpenRouter charges 5% commission and already processes on Stripe which, as Simon Taylor explains, gives Stripe a 7.5% take rate on the AI economy. Blimey again.

Business of Payments | Geoffrey Barraclough | Substack

Stripe has been hiring to support this growth including job titles such as “Forward Deployed AI Accelerator.” I think this means “sales engineer.” Let me know if I’m wrong.

Line graph comparing AI hiring trends for Stripe and Adyen between August 2025 and August 2026, showing an increase in unique AI roles over time.

Figure 1 Credit: PCN Insights

The AI market is at a very early stage and it’s hard to see these economics holding as companies grow and competitors sense an opportunity to take share from Stripe. For example, OpenAI is now dual-sourcing its processing with a new agreement with Adyen which covers ChatGPT’s subscription sales. The more complex metered token billing stays with Stripe.

That deal was announced as part of another very positive set of results for Adyen in H1with volume up 24% to €804bn and net revenue up 19% to €1.3bn. Adyen reports all segments and all geographies are growing nicely. EMEA, up 15%, was the slowest growing region, possibly reflecting weak consumer spending in Germany and elsewhere.

Adyen’s management has surprised the market this year with two acquisitions – Orb (complex billing for AI companies) and Talon.One (loyalty) – at a combined cost of €1bn. Although the deals will add just €25-50m revenue in 2027, these capabilities help position Adyen for two large new merchant segments – grocery and AI. Orb gives Adyen the right to play with the AI natives which, today, are typically associated with Stripe.

Line graph showing Adyen's net revenue by geography in billion euros from H1 2021 to H1 2026, with data for EMEA, North America, Asia Pacific, and Latin America.

In general, payment companies have reported little impact from the ongoing conflict in the Middle East but Shift4 – new owner of the Global Blue tax-free shopping business – said reduced international travel was hitting sales by c.$20m a quarter. And Global Payments took a $31m Q2 net revenue hit from regional airline clients inherited from Worldpay.

Global Payments has given some insight into the combined Worldpay/Global business. An analysis of its H1 results shows that legacy Global is mainly SMB and highly profitable. In contrast, legacy Worldpay is stronger in enterprise but less profitable in all segments and losing money in SMB. There’s clearly a big margin improvement play available for Global’s management. More on the Business of Payments blog.

Bar chart showing New GPN segment income before central costs in millions of dollars for Enterprise, Platforms, and SMB categories, comparing Legacy Global Payments and Legacy Worldpay.

Also on the Business of Payments blog this month:

Flatpay, the fast-growing POS-focused SME vendor, reported revenues tripling to €39m in 2025 as expansion into Germany began to deliver. Flatpay’s prodigious hiring (2,000 staff by June 2026) contributed to an operating loss of €70m. With merchant numbers now exceeding 100,000, management is forecasting 2026 revenues growing to €100-105m while losses widen to €140-150m. Investors are buying the story. Flatpay raised €146m last year at a €1.5bn valuation. More on the Business of Payments blog.

Bar chart showing revenue and operating profit for Flatpay in 2024 and 2025, with values in millions of euros.

Flatpay is a high-profile member of the “tap pack” – a well-financed group of SME-focused POS payment PSPs expanding across Europe. In other “tap pack” news, Dojo has reached €1bn volume in Italy and SumUp is sponsoring Newcastle United this season. Its marketing team have done a lovely job with this video linking small business, community, football and card payments.

Payment hardware is a tough market. Ingenico revenues were down 11% in 2025, hitting free cashflow and leading to a default on interest payments to bondholders. Apollo, the giant US PE house that was behind the €2.3bn demerger of Ingenico fromWorldline in 2022, has walked away with losses of €600m or more. Now, Ingenico has bought itself some breathing space. Lenders agreed a €150m “capital restructure” that should reduce interest payments to manageable levels. PIMCO and other bondholders have converted €400m of the €1.1bn outstanding debt to equity and injected more cash. Much now depends on the success of Ingenico’s Axium range of Android terminals.

It’s been a quiet summer for corporate activity but Monext, a French PSP owned by Credit Mutuel, has bought Alcineo, a softPOS vendor with 30 employees and €5-10m revenues which supplies 48 clients including myPOS. Monext claims 2,000 clients, €7bn volume and will now have good in-house capability for embedded payments.

In fundraising news, Nopan (geddit?) raised €7.23m to bring card-style payment optimisation tools to A2A and wallets. Nopan is based in Amsterdam, founded by former Netflix payments execs and already has a payment institution licence. Adriaan Mol (founder of Mollie) posted about Nopan on LinkedIn, saying that he thinks it sounds like a stupid investment. I think this is a little harsh. 

ePOS Now, a fast-growing UK-based retail and café software unicorn, has secured £90m bank finance to accelerate its international expansion. Adyen supplies the payments.

Staying in the UK, Kord, a start-up looking to make onboarding easier for regulated businesses including payments, has raised a total of £9m.


AI innovation in merchant acquiring

I’m helping Datos find case studies for a new report. If you’re doing anything innovative with AI and merchant acquiring, please get in touch. 

A digital call for submissions poster titled 'AI Innovation in Merchant Acquiring', emphasizing global research on innovative AI applications for merchant acquiring, inviting banks, non-bank acquirers, and vendors to submit AI solution deployments. It includes examples of innovation categories, a participation guide, and a submission deadline of September 18, 2026.

Software and payments converge

Small merchants across Europe are less and less likely to take payments from their bank. Instead, they are increasingly likely to buy a bundle of payments and software, fronted by their software vendor (ISV). The choice of software drives the choice of payments vendor, not the other way around.

Shopify is the best example. The Canadian commerce platform which hosts webshops for over 3m merchants is now processing c.$75bn a quarter through its Shopify Payments product. This volume primarily goes through Stripe although analysts at UBS report that Shopify has started processing with Adyen for some Shopify Payments transactions in Europe, initially in France and the UK. Margins are thin. UBS estimates Adyen will be getting just 5bps on these transactions.

Line graph displaying Shopify merchant payment volume in billion dollars over time, with a blue line representing Shopify payments and an orange line representing other payment methods, measured on a 4-month moving average.

Following Shopify’s example, most retail or hospitality ISVs have now launched their own payment service. It’s a fast-growing market but we’ve lacked benchmarking data until now. An excellent new research report from Rainforest, which provides a white-label service allowing ISVs to bundle payments with their core product, shows attachment rates varying from 33% to 93%. The data is from the US but increasingly relevant for Europe too. Rainforest concludes that ISVs prize ease of integration above commercial terms and that the successful ones have hired a payment expert in senior management.

A table with numbers and percentages

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Figure 2 Source: Vertical SaaS Embedded Payments, Rainforest

ISVs tend to start their payments journey by simply reselling a product from one of the large processors. Adyen tends to dominate multi-channel uses in Europe but there is space for smaller payment processors with a clear focus on a particular market segment. For example, Unipaas – a London-based PF-as-a-service vendor founded by ex SafeCharge execs – has won three childcare platforms.

But more mature software vendors are increasingly unafraid of moving into financial services themselves. Mews, the fast-growing Amsterdam-based hotel software vendor, has got an EMI licence from the Dutch National Bank.

Beyond payments, many ISVs are looking to provide capital to their merchants. Direct-to-SME lending has been a very difficult category for years but a number of businesses are specialising in providing loans to merchants via software platforms. In Europe, Youlend, Liberis, 365 Finance and Flowpay are among the leaders. Distribution costs are low and the vertical platforms have sufficient data to avoid obviously bad risks.

For more on embedded finance (including payments), I recommend the Embedded Finance Review.

Scheming

Despite political talk of the need for payment sovereignty, Visa and Mastercard continue to grow volume in Europe – up 9% in euros in Q2 according to latest filings. That’s twice the pace of retail sales growth and indicates the Americans are still taking market share from cash and domestic schemes. More on the Business of Payments blog.

chart, bar chart, histogram

Mastercard is reportedly looking to sell Vocalink, the organisation which runs the UK’s core payment infrastructure including instant payments. There have also been rumours that Mastercard will sell Nets Group, which plays a similar role in Denmark. Mastercard’s retreat from A2A is likely to be as much about economics as geopolitics. Vocalink’s sales of £212m grew just 2% in 2025 – equivalent to just 1.5p per transaction or a take rate of 0.2bps. It’s very hard to get rich from direct debits.

Staying in the UK, the Payment Systems Regulator found that Visa and Mastercard “increased their core scheme and processing fees to acquirers by at least 25% since 2017, costing businesses at least £170 million extra per year.” Now, the PSR will force the schemes to publish “auditable records of all new pricing decisions.” Acquirers and merchants often feel that many of the fees are slightly random so this will make an interesting read.

#werowatch

Wero, the European Payment Initiative’s wallet based on SEPA Instant, is making steady progress. The werotracker website shows banks now live in four countries – Bunq in the Netherlands being the latest – and over 120 eCommerce merchants now accepting wero.

Bar chart showing the growth of Wero eCommerce merchants from February to July 2026, with a steady increase in the number of merchants over the months.

For wero to succeed, it’s not sufficient to be listed by retailers. New use cases such as this implementation on parking meters by VR Payments in Germany will help. But wero also will need to be promoted to consumers. The EPI won’t be happy with its placement at the foot of Lidl’s checkout page.

Bezahlen bei Lidl: So funktioniert die Zahlung mit Wero

In the early stages, most of wero’s volume will come from the takeover of iDEAL, the very popular bank transfer system in the Netherlands. The migration is going ahead from October. A key consumer benefit is purchasing protection which will be phased in by 2028.

A close-up of a logo

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

This all indicates positive momentum but we’re still awaiting volume or transaction numbers to demonstrate wero is meeting a real consumer need.

Turning to more established domestic schemes, latest numbers show a very mixed performance. In Poland, Blik is still growing strongly; volume was up 18% to €29bn in H1 2026. It’s striking that Blik’s spectacular growth has not come at the expense of cards. eCommerce card volume has almost tripled since 2020.

Line graph displaying eCommerce transaction volume in PLN billion from 2020 to 2026, comparing methods such as Blik, Cards, Open banking, and Pay by links (A2A).

Bancomat, the Italian scheme taken into private equity ownership in 2024, looks to be prospering. According to its annual report, sales were up 63% in 2025 to €85m. Network fees grew 23% but most of the increase came from the new “infrastructure services division” (built by Nexi) which has begun taking processing volume from regional banks.

Bar graph illustrating Bancomat's revenue and profit in millions of euros from 2022 to 2025, with revenue shown in blue and EBIT in green.

In contrast, Girocard, the German scheme, grew volume less than 1% to €152bn in H1 2026 even as the number of terminals rose by 11% to 1.4m. 

Digital euro

The digital euro is increasingly viewed as essential for payment sovereignty although many in the industry are sceptical about whether it genuinely solves a pain point for merchants or shoppers. Rachel Greener looks at the arguments and concludes that, although the digital euro has limited value today, it does bring option value for an increasingly uncertain tomorrow.

Returning to 2026, the EBA has selected 36 PSPs to join a pilot programme. The list includes Adyen, Nexi (which seems particularly excited), Stripe, SumUp and Worldline. The pilot begins late 2027 with full launch scheduled in 2029. With the draft rule book already approaching 1,000 pages (including the annexes), Goran Bosankić explains what vendors need to be doing now.

Open banking

The industry trumpeted the remarkable 100bn API calls made since the competition authorities mandated open banking in 2018. Yet despite the high-profile adoption of open banking payments by Amazon and others earlier this year, the rate of growth dipped in July to 38%. A little over 41m payments were made that month compared to over 2bn debit card transactions. There’s a long way to go.

Bar chart showing UK Open Banking Payments in millions with monthly data from February to July. The blue bars represent total payments, while the orange line indicates the annual change percentage.

Many are hoping that the UK Payments Initiative will come to the rescue by speeding adoption of variable recurring payments, the open banking equivalent of direct debits.

One immediate challenge is that both public and merchants are familiar with direct debits and feel very positively about them. Volume may be hard to shift. Researchers from pay.uk found merchants particularly valued the “direct debit guarantee” which allows consumers to repudiate transactions. The UK PI will need to match this.

Bar chart showing reasons for using Direct Debit payments and their corresponding percentages. Key reasons include easy recurring payments (68%), security for customers (49%), and it being a preferred method (46%). Other reasons include managing missed payments (36%), low cost of acceptance (35%), low chance of failure (33%), cash flow support (29%), low fraud rate (25%), and broader reach (23%), with 1% for other reasons.

Figure 4 Direct debit attitudes. “What drives your usage of direct debits?”

Another challenge is user experience. Open banking fraud levels are low (just 2.4bps of payment volume in Q1 2026) but the headline figure hides a major problem. Most of the fraud is authorised push payment (APP) but the tactics used by banks to minimise APP work directly against the slick user experience open banking needs to compete with cards. Each time a customer is presented a screen asking “do you really want to make this transaction”, the likelihood of a purchase is reduced. At the ACI Payments Unleashed conference in June, the head of payments at Vinted explained why his business was sticking with cards despite the cost advantage of open banking. Each extra customer click cuts conversion rate 25%, he said.

Agentic

Everyone thinks agentic commerce will be big, although nobody knows when. In anticipation of big volumes ahead, the industry is adopting a bewildering array of new standards and partnerships. The latest is the Agentic Payment Alliance featuring Visa and Mastercard.

Yet it’s not clear that consumers are ready to delegate serious buying decisions to agents. Google has pulled back from its “buy for me” proposition, favouring less autonomous shopping experience. For example, Square and Toast have both integrated with Google Maps via Google’s UC protocol to help Americans buy junk food on the way home from work. But this isn’t pure agentic commerce. You have to press “confirm” for each order.

Card payments – flexible and globally accepted – will be relatively easy to adapt to agentic commerce although liability needs some thought. Who should reimburse the consumer if an agent makes a mistake? And there’s a risk of agents overwhelming the industry with disputes, particularly when used for low-value high-frequency purchases. Rivero has a good white paper that lists the issues ahead.

Crypto corner

Stablecoins are much hyped but we’re still waiting for data that demonstrates widespread adoption. Here’s a summary of today’s use of stablecoins in merchant payments.

Starting with uses where a customer pays the merchant in stablecoins, nearly always USDC, Visa’s chain analytics calculates that roughly $6bn per month of stablecoin transactions are “retail sized” – that is, less than $250.

A screenshot of a graph

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

FXC Intelligence calculates that just 0.59% of cross-border consumer-to-business transactions – roughly $29bn annually – are using stablecoins. Shopify now allows its merchants to accept stablecoins in most developed markets although has made no comment on volumes. 

One reason stablecoin acceptance is not growing more quickly is that it’s actually quite complicated for merchants. Rapyd prepared a good deck that lays out the challenges, notably: multiple blockchains, networks, wallets and providers, liquidity spread across different places, FX still happening on both ends, on-ramps and off-ramps that don’t always behave consistently and users who don’t fully trust or understand the flow.

This is one reason why the industry is excited about stablecoin cards. With these (normally Visa) cards, the consumer spends coins, but the merchant is settled in his usual currency. Latest data shows c.$500m a month spent in this way with Hong Kong fintech Redotpay accounting for slightly more than half. Although growing, this is still a drop in the ocean compared to Visa and Mastercard’s combined payment volume of c.$2 trillion each month.

A graph of a bar

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Figure 5 Stablecoin card purchases. Source: Dune

In other news

If your marketing team begins any piece with “In today’s fast-moving landscape, how do you stay ahead?, get a new marketing team. Cokie Hasiotis writes that we need to ban the unreadable corporate slop which pervades LinkedIn and the avalanche of white papers clogging our inboxes. One downside giving your staff access to Co-pilot is the massive increase unreadable B2B content.

Walmart has finally agreed to accept NFC payments in stores. The US grocery giant was the last hold-out against Apple Pay but has bowed to the inevitable. Consumers want to pay with their phones and retailers must accept this.

The state of Florida has named Worldpay and Trustly in legal action against online casinos. It’s increasingly common for processors to be held responsible for their customers. What’s new, and potentially very uncomfortable for the industry, is that the docket also includes Yodlee and Praxis. These payment orchestrators sit outside the money flow and wouldn’t normally be required to run KYC and AML checks.

Weak KYC, poor expense controls. Pymnts reimagines the Odyssey as fintech.

Generated image: Ancient Galley with a Modern Card Reader

Poland is axing its “small payment institution” licence. This was a pro-innovation move by the regulator to encourage start-ups but, in reality, it seems that small PIs “are associated with a very high risk of enabling money laundering and circumvention of sanctions.” There are no shortcuts to compliance.

Dutch research shows people love contactless ticketing on public transport but are very confused about what they are billed and when.

Why are payments always blue? A brand guru looks at the industry, calls for more colourful marketing and praises Mastercard’s easily recognisable palette.

I’m always looking for new uses of payment data but wasn’t expecting Stripe to tell the UK statistics authorities that its numbers of new business formation are wrong.

In Spain, CaixaBank has made 40 benches from plastic recycled from expired bank cards. The benches, which don’t look very comfortable, will be installed in villages across Castilla y Leon where the bank’s mobile branches stop.

The Territorial Director of CaixaBank in Castilla y León, Gerardo Cuartero (centre); the First Vice President of the Provincial Council of Ávila, Jesús Martín (left), and the Mayor of Serranillos, Carlos Cayuela (right), with one of the benches made from recycled cards.

And finally

The Association of Banks in Singapore got in trouble when it began masking parts of users’ names with the letter “X”. “My entire family’s surname just became NSFW (not safe for work),” wrote Facebook user Jeremy See, whose name was displayed as “JERXXX SEX WEX LOXX”. Another user, Ron Foo, wrote: “My name becomes so erotic … FOX SEX POX.”

Bank association 'aware of feedback' after PayNow name masking spells out inappropriate words

Figure 6 Channel News Asia

Flatpay: Growing fast, burning faster

Flatpay, the hyper-aggressive SME payment unicorn from Denmark, has published its 2025 annual report which shows fast growing revenues and widening operating losses. 

Founded in 2022, Flatpay claims to be the fastest growing payment business ever and might be right. In June 2026, the business said it had reached €20bn annual volume at €100m annualised revenue from over 100,000 customers. It’s one of the most successful members of the “tap pack” – a group of start-ups focusing on small shops and restaurants across Europe. This includes Dojo, Viva, myPOS, Square and SumUp.

Focusing on the audited statements for 2025, revenue more than tripled to €39m as Flatpay’s fast-paced European expansion began to deliver results.

Bar chart showing Flatpay's revenue and operating profit for the years 2024 and 2025 in millions of euros. Revenue is represented in blue and operating profit in gray.

Here’s a good podcast in which Sander Janca-Jensen, Flatpay’s founder explains the secrets behind its phenomenal growth.

Sander doesn’t mention Flatpay’s innovative, although controversial, policy of offering merchants free processing of business and international cards funded through a consumer surcharge. Competitors think this is one of the key factors behind its growth and one that could soon be replicated by others in the market.

Flatpay’s expansion is made possible by its ruthlessly simple proposition. One payment terminal (a PAX A920) and one distribution model. All sales are direct sales which means there are no partners to manage or pay commissions to.

Bar chart showing Flatpay revenue projections for 2025 in millions of euros, with Denmark and Germany having the highest revenues, followed by Finland, Italy, and Others.

Looking in more detail, Germany (€15m) has become Flatpay’s largest market although Finland (€6m) and Italy (€4m) have begun to make significant contributions. France, Great Britain and the Netherlands should start delivering in 2026.

Operating losses widened from €20m to €70m. Average FTE jumped from 257 to 957 and staff costs rose by €49m to €69m, almost matching the €50m increase in operating losses. Headcount has continued to rise, reaching 2,000 by June 2026.  

Rapid merchant acquisition consumes capital as well as eating operating cash. At year end, Flatpay had €40m of equipment on its balance sheet – presumably including the stock of payment terminals to be leased to merchants – including  €14m prepaid for future deliveries.  

The total resulting cash burn is startling. Free cash outflow, before financing, was €94m although this was more outweighed by an additional €146m raised during 2025 at a €1.5bn valuation and a €24m loan from Denmark’s Export and Investment Fund.

Flatpay shows every indication of keeping its foot on the accelerator. Management expects revenue to more than double again in 2026 to reach €100-105m but forecasts losses ballooning to €140-150m as the business continues investing heavily in expansion. With customer numbers growing at a remarkable 7% a month, Flatpay is conducting a fascinating experiment in just how quickly a European payments business can be built,  and how much capital it takes to do it.

Nexi – low growth, strong cashflow

Nexi reassured investors with another quarter in which it delivered what it promised: modest growth but strong cashflow. 

Total revenues grew 1.1% in Q2 to €915m. Merchant solutions, the largest division was flat as the impact of new merchant signings was offset by the migration of the Banco BPM portfolio in Italy. This was 140.000 POS terminals lost to Numia.

Issuing grew 1.4%, held back by the continuing migration of a large issuing customer which is bringing processing in-house. 

Digital banking solutions, up 6%, was the best performer, boosted by its role in Zippay, the Irish bank’s quixotic attempt to build a home-grown wero.

Management is very excited to be part of the digital euro programme and has been selected in a consortium run by G&D to provide offline acceptance. Meaningful revenues are many years away but involvement in the ECB’s project nicely positions Nexi at the heart of Europe’s new payment infrastructure.

Line graph depicting Nexi's net revenue in millions of euros over multiple quarters, showing three categories: Merchant solutions, Issuing solutions, and Digital banking solutions, with varying revenue trends across time periods.
Bar chart showing Nexi payment volume in billion euros over several quarters, with a blue bar representing unadjusted total and an orange line indicating annual growth rate.

Merchant solutions revenue was flat in Q2 at €522m despite 5% volume growth, reflecting the BancoBPM loss and pressure on non-transaction revenues. One competitor in Italy (Nexi’s largest market) is drving down hardware margins by offering free payment terminals. Flatpay looks the likely culprit.

Bar graph showing Nexi payment volume in billion euros, with unadjusted totals on the left axis and annual growth rate indicated by an orange line on the right axis, covering multiple quarters.

Management highlighted macro weakness in Germany, citing the redundancies in the automotive sector and higher level of business insolvencies. This has impact volumes in hospitality. Poland continued to be squeezed by pricing pressure in eCommerce. 

On the positive, new customer wins are “growing mid-teens” and the German ISV channel at “about 30%,” helped by migrating Orderbird volume from another acquirer. Nexi took full control of Orderbird, a Berlin-based restaurant software vendor, in 2022, eight years after Concardis first invested, It says concerns about channel conflict mean that Nexi won’t be taking Orderbird outside Germany. 

Nexi presented another quarter of good cost control. Total expenses rose just 2% with personnel expense up 4%.

Nexi isn’t growing much, but it is becoming a formidable cash machine; generating over €400m in H1, ahead of expectations. EBITDA margins stable at 50% and Nexi cut leverage despite paying a €350m dividend in May, redeeming €1bn of debt and spending c.€160m on the Banco Popolare di Sondrio portfolio. 

Nexi also confirmed to UBS that it recently rejected an offer for Digital Banking Solutions (DBS). Management now believes that digital euro opportunity makes DBS strategic to the group. Meanwhile, investor chatter continues about a possible private-equity bid for Nexi as a whole.

But for the moment, investors are beginning to buy the story. The stock price is up 50% since its all-time low in March with the market capitalisation now standing at almost €5bn. Nexi is no Worldline; but it’s no Adyen either. Even after the recent rally, Nexi still offers a dividend yield of about 7% and trades on an equity free-cash-flow yield of roughly 15%, suggesting the market continues to price in considerable risk.

Global Payments: the Worldpay margin opportunity

The first detailed numbers from the combined Global Payments (GPN) and Worldpay reveal just how different the two businesses are. And the scale of the opportunity if Global can bring Worldpay’s profitability anywhere close to its own.

Global Payments is notoriously discreet with its public disclosures. The 10-Q document has historically given little detail on revenue breakdown by segments or geographies. Very few KPIs are ever published but the H1 26 results do now show worldwide sales and margin numbers from its three reorganised operating units – SMB, platforms and enterprise. 

Global includes Worldpay in its numbers from January 2026 so, by comparing the combined 2026 numbers with legacy Global Payments’ 2025 results, we can estimate the contributions from the Worldpay acquisition for the first time. The precise Worldpay segment margins presented below are estimates, of course, but are directionally accurate and back up a widely held view that Global has bought a structurally different merchant portfolio.

Bar chart illustrating Global Payments revenue for H1 2026 in millions of dollars, comparing Legacy Global Payments and Worldpay across categories: Enterprise, Platforms, and SMB.

My key conclusions are:

SMB – overwhelmingly legacy Global Payments and very profitable, possibly because of its portfolio of software businesses. Worldpay’s rather smaller SMB portfolio appears to be losing money although the numbers do include significant acquisition related intangible amortisation. 25% of Global’s SMB revenue comes from outside the US compared with 45% of Worldpay’s; the vast majority likely to be in the UK. 

Enterprise – overwhelmingly Worldpay although legacy Global has much better margins. The portfolios are quite different: Worldpay enterprise is 80% CNP (eCommerce) but Global is majority (54%) POS.

Platforms – relatively evenly sized but, again, Global has much better profitability. Worldpay platforms is 41% embedded – likely mainly through the Payrix PF as a service proposition. Global is 93% traditional integrated payments.  

Bar chart showing New GPN segment income before central costs in millions of dollars, comparing Global Payments and Worldpay across three categories: Enterprise, Platforms, and SMB.

Improving Worldpay’s margins will be a key focus for the new management team. The prize is substantial. Business of Payments estimates that closing just half the margin gap between Worldpay and the legacy Global businesses could add close to $1bn of annual segment income. Global itself is targeting $600m of annual Worldpay integration expense synergies by the end of 2028. This won’t be easy; not least because almost half of Worldpay’s SMB business is in the UK which (according to Global’s CEO) “is kind of struggling from a macro standpoint. And certainly, we’re seeing a little bit of softness in the UK market.” 

Bar graph comparing segment margins of New Global Payments before central costs, highlighting Enterprise, Platforms, and SMB categories.

Commenting on the enterprise segment, Global’s management had some good news as the company has gone live with processing at two large UK supermarkets – Morrisons and Aldi. Less positively, Global Payments is one of the few payments companies reporting a significant impact from the Middle East turmoil, with a $31m Q2 net revenue hit from airline clients inherited with Worldpay. 

These initial numbers show why Global Payments was so keen to buy Worldpay. It has acquired considerable additional scale, particularly in enterprise, but at much lower margins than its legacy businesses. If management can close even part of that profitability gap, the financial upside is substantial. The challenge will be doing so while simultaneously consolidating platforms, developing new products, retaining customers and managing all the personnel issues that come with such a massive merger.

Visa and Mastercard: Still winning in Europe

Despite increasing political focus on payment sovereignty, total payment volume growth from the American schemes in Europe picked up a little in Q2 according to the latest financial results from Visa and Mastercard. 

Total volume rose 12% in dollars (9% in euros) to a combined €1.47 trillion. This is slight uptick after six quarters of declining growth rates but well below the consistent double digits we saw through 2023 and 2024. Nonetheless, 9% volume growth is 2-3 times nominal GDP growth and roughly double nominal consumer spending growth. This indicates that Visa and Mastercard remain key beneficiaries of the secular shift towards digital money.

Bar chart showing scheme payment volume in Europe from 2023 to Q2 2026, comparing Visa and Mastercard volumes, with an overlay line indicating the combined growth rate percentage.

Visa maintained its slight lead over Mastercard with volume of €749bn vs €721bn. Overall average transaction value was flat at €33.50.

Both schemes also report cash transactions – mainly withdrawals from ATMs – and these have proved remarkably resilient. But the headline figure of €285bn of cash transactions in Q2 masks changing consumer behaviour. People are taking out more cash less often. A fall of 9% in the number of transactions was almost entirely offset an increase in ATV to €285. 

Bar chart showing Visa and MCI combined cash transactions in Europe from Q2 2023 to Q2 2026, with total volume (in billion euros) represented by blue bars and average transaction value (ATV) displayed as a gray line.

Globally, the lucrative cross-border card payment market keeps growing, up 12% in constant dollars in Q2. Despite the Middle East disruption, commercial transactions were buoyant and inbound spending by foreigners in the US continued to improve, boosted by the World Cup in June. Visa reported that card present transactions in host cities were up 20% on match days; notably contactless payments in mass transit.

Mastercard added that impacts from the instability in the Middle East moderated throughout the second quarter and were less severe than anticipated. Wealthy residents of the impacted GCC countries, have begun spending more money abroad.  

The growth numbers tell only half the story. Behind the scenes, the real battle is for issuers, where both schemes continue to invest heavily in winning new issuing mandates. In Q2, both schemes trumpeted new client wins in Europe that will deliver more cards, or credentials as they are now often called. Yet there seems some evidence they are becoming more disciplined about the economics of portfolio wins.

Line graph showing the number of cards issued in Europe from Q2 2023 to Q2 2026, comparing Visa and Mastercard. Visa cards are represented in dark blue and show a gradual increase, while Mastercard cards are in orange, also showing an upward trend.

Visa says that through portfolio migrations and organic expansion it has added more than 40 million European cards in the last 12 months and say that a further 30 million are in the pipeline. Visa recently won “the entire consumer credit portfolio” of Natwest’s retail bank and says it expects to continue to win debit business from domestic schemes such as Giro in Germany and Carte Bancaire in France. These local players are now investing in new features such as pre-authorisations, pay-outs and Apple Pay support but have been slow to modernise, leaving a gap for Visa and Mastercard to grow their debit business in Europe. 

This explains why Mastercard is serious about replacing the old-fashioned Maestro with feature-rich Mastercard Debit. The number of Maestros issued fell 19% to 271m. 

Bar graph showing the number of Maestro cards in millions from Q2 2023 to Q2 2026, with a general decline over time.

Mastercard says it “flipped” Eurobank’s entire consumer and commercial portfolios in Greece and is working with Santander in the UK to accelerate cross-border spend through targeted marketing campaigns. Michael Miebach, Mastercard’s CEO says he has refused European issuing deals which don’t make financial sense, including Lloyds Bank’s credit portfolio. He added: “winning share of a portfolio which is growing at 1% helps me in the first year and then is a huge drag on growth for the years thereafter.”

Both schemes discussed the impact of AI on their operations. Visa says that it has changed its product development model. Instead of teams of ten people, product development is now carried out by “nimble agentic squads” of two to four staff. This delivers “80% more code commits and 80% plus improvement in requirement definition from 30 days to 5 days, which has translated to 65% plus faster feature development.” This improved productivity, helped Visa ship more than 300 major product releases over last 12 months. Result: an announcement of layoffs impacting 7% of its global headcount, with most cuts landing on technology and product teams.

Today’s stablecoins look complicated and there’s a clear opportunity for the schemes to bring the scale, security and interoperability necessary for mass-market adoption. Although stablecoins have clear utility in global treasury and possibly some B2B and P2P flows, they seem unlikely to make many inroads into merchant payments. “There’s no problem to solve,” says Michael Miebach, Mastercard’s CEO. He added that its crypto co-brand volume had more than tripled over the last 2 years although didn’t give figures. 

Both schemes are investing in stablecoin capability, mainly related to settlement. Mastercard has acquired BVNK, giving it a ready-made stablecoin infrastructure business serving merchants, PSPs and finTechs. Visa has instead built Visa Stablecoin Platform in-house, targeting banks and payment institutions with a platform integrated into Visa’s existing network. VSP will integrate with Visa’s very successful Pismo card issuing platform, likely making the whole proposition very attractive to its bank customers.

Visa and Mastercard are both key members of the new Open Standard initiative which will issue the Open USD stablecoin. Many think that Open USD is going after Circle and Tether (the businesses behind the two leading stablecoins today) but Ryan McInerney, Visa’s CEO says that “Visa going forward will remain multi-coin, multi chain. Our role is not to pick winners.”

Visa’s Cybersource eCommerce gateway has launched a “unified checkout” which orchestrates multiple payment types. 4.500 sellers and acquirers have enabled unified checkout including one of the largest acquirers in the UK; most likely to be Barclaycard Payments. And Corpay will adopt Visa’s Fleet 2.0 solution for its fuel card platform in Europe.

In litigation news Visa has been granted leave to appeal the UK Competition Appeals Tribunal decision on Interchange. Less positively, a group of merchants has filed a claim at the UK high court alleging interchange fees are an unlawful restriction and seeking damages dating back to 2019. Mastercard’s trial in Portugal for similar allegations is set for October. 

Finally, neither scheme provided meaningful evidence that agentic commerce is yet generating material payment volumes. Maybe we’ll learn more in Q3 but I suspect I suspect meaningful payment volumes remain at least another year away.

Santander Payment Solutions: From scepticism to success

Four years ago, I wasn’t convinced Santander could turn a collection of disparate payments assets into a coherent platform but the latest results suggest it has done exactly that. Santander is now a rare European bank making a success of merchant payments, delivering consistent growth and rewarding shareholders with eight successive quarters of profitability.

It’s not been an easy journey. Santander first put its payment assets together in 2020 under the PagoNxt brand and bought Wirecard’s tech platform and Munich operations. The result: an alphabet soup of brands and €170m write-offs.  

The business is much clearer now. PagoNxt has been renamed Santander Payment Solutions and consists of three divisions:

  • Getnet merchant acquiring, active in Iberia and Latin America
  • Getnet Platforms, including A2A and Santander’s issuing processing which services the group’s retail businesses in Brazil, Mexico, Chile, Spain and the UK
  • Ebury, London-based trade finance specialists which has long been a candidate for IPO

With 1.2m merchant customers, Getnet is the division that most interests readers of Business of Payments. Getnet Payment volume grew an impressive 17% in Q2 to €67bn, and has roughly doubled since 2021.

Getnet offers a single API to connect to its Latin American markets which helps international merchants easily navigate multi-market entry. This was one reason for improved performance in Mexico and Brazil. The latter despite the rapid growth of PIX, which has yet to make a meaningful dent in card acquiring.

Recent product enhancements include “Pay In” for Brazil which allows international merchants to receive payments without establishing a legal entity in the country, DCC in Mexico and white-labelling AEVI’s POS platform (initially in Mexico) which will help secure business from large retailers. 

The total number of transactions, including both Getnet acquiring and Getnet platforms,  rose to 8.6bn in Q2 26, up 48% year on year, largely driven by increased A2A activity in Brazil. This number may well be associated with PIX.

Santander management has highlighted the importance of scale in driving down unit costs. This strategy is working. Cost per transaction for the half year was 1.6c compared with 2.9c a year ago and 3.6c in 2024. 

A report on H1 2026 performance of global payment platforms, highlighting revenue growth and profitability improvements. Key figures include €129 billion TPV for Getnet, a 10% increase, 9 million transactions for Getnet Platforms, a 5x increase, and a 28% rise in active customers for Ebury, totaling 28,000. The report emphasizes a strong rise in transactions and transactional cost efficiencies.

Figure 1: Santander Payment Solutions Q2 26 results slide

The improved unit economics has begun to flow to the bottom line.

Bar chart displaying the revenue and net operating income of Santander Payment Solutions over several quarters, indicating consistent profitability.

Net revenue grew 19% to €387m, expenses were up 16% to €337m reflecting continued platform investments and net operating income rose 46% to €51m. The operating margin is a very respectable 13%. Cash performance is even better. Santander Payment Solutions generated EBITDA of €123m in Q2 26, a healthy 32% margin.

Santander has proved it can build a profitable merchant acquiring platform. The next challenge is to turn Getnet from a regional champion into a genuinely pan-European proposition. That means expanding beyond its traditional Iberian and Latin American strongholds and strengthening its merchant offering in markets where the bank has a major presence such as the UK and Poland.

Mollie: Well run, ambitious and making two big bets

Mollie is one of Europe’s fastest-growing payment companies. Its 2025 annual report, posted at the Dutch Chamber of Commerce, shows a business executing well operationally, but about to embark on a far riskier phase.

Gross revenue was up 31% to €274.3 and net revenue (after deducting processing costs) grew 23% to €156m. That’s the old Mollie. The company is now being transformed with a €350m plan for pan-European expansion at the same time as closing its €1.1bn acquisition of London-based GoCardless.

Bar chart showing Mollie Group BV revenue and profit in million euros for 2022, 2024, and 2025, with net revenue in blue and operating income in gray.

“We’re here to eliminate financial bureaucracy,” says Mollie, positioning itself as the one-stop shop for European SMEs. Adrian Mol, who founded the business and named it after himself, believes there is a substantial opportunity to build a true European payment champion. You could characterise Mollie as an Adyen for SMEs with its full stack of products including online and POS payment acceptance, omnichannel reporting and support for complex use cases such as  marketplaces, franchises and embedded payments for software vendors. 

Mollie depends on its acquiring partners, Checkout.com and Rapyd, for processing. This keeps capex low, reduces the compliance overhead and simplifies expansion into new markets. But leaves Mollie with less control over authorisation optimisation and interchange economics than vertically integrated acquirers such as Stripe, Adyen and Checkout.

Despite the launch of a number of payment-adjacent products including lending (partnering Youlend), business accounts and loyalty, over 90% of turnover came from payment processing on behalf of over 250.000 merchant customers. “Capital revenue”, likely to be mainly commission income from merchant cash advances more than doubled to €5.7m. This could form the basis for an important new business line.

Although Mollie has begun to internationalise, the vast majority of revenue came from its heartland of Benelux (€165m) and DACH (€63.9m). Sales from other geographies (including the UK) grew more slowly, up 19% to €46m.

Bar chart showing Mollie Group BV revenue by geography for the years 2023, 2024, and 2025, with categories for Benelux, DACH, Rest of Europe including the UK, and Rest of World.

This may change soon as Mollie is well funded and has big plans. Management says the business is now operational in all 30 countries of the EEA plus the UK and will invest €350m in building out its product offer and team across Europe. Mollie has set up “regional development hubs” in Milan, Stockholm and Warsaw. Lisbon is coming soon. 

The €350m investment excludes the Netherlands (Mollie’s home market) and the UK where it is making a major strategic move in buying GoCardless. The price is €1.1bn in stock, a rather generous 6x multiple of GoCardless’s 2025 revenues. The combined group is valued at €4.1bn (according to Mollie) and has moved its domicile to the UK while keeping tax residency in the Netherlands.

Bar graph showing GoCardless revenue breakdown (£m) from 2021 to 2025, comparing revenue from the UK & Ireland and the Rest of the world.

GoCardless is growing more slowly than Mollie – sales were up 18% to £155m in 2025, despite its acquisition of Nuapay, a leading direct debit provider. GoCardless is losing money and in need of capital despite having raised a total of $600m. Swapping GoCardless equity for Mollie’s stock looks sensible for GoCardless shareholders but it is less obvious why Mollie’s investors should be enthusiastic. Mollie is growing nicely with a clear path to profitability and a stronger balance sheet. Building A2A capability internally would likely be rather cheaper than paying the equivalent of €11,000 per GoCardless merchant. Possibly the prize is an opportunity to cross-sell card processing to the large UK GoCardless base. 

Bar graph showing the net revenues in millions of euros for Mollie and GoCardless in 2025, with categories for Mollie card processing, Other Mollie, Nuapay (bank payments), and GoCardless (A2A).

Returning to Mollie’s 2025 results, costs were well contained and are growing proportionally to revenues. Administrative expenses rose 28% to €159m including a 19% increase in staff expenses to €106m. Employee numbers rose 16% to 857 at an average cost of €125K each. 

Mollie looks to be running a tight ship. Expected credit losses were €2.7m, a steady 2% of net revenue which is very reasonable for an SME book. Chargeback provisions grew slightly to €2.9m indicating that Mollie is sticking with low-risk merchants. Operating losses slipped to €19m from €9m in 2024.  

Mollie has been one of the stand-out successes in European payments over the past few years. Beginning with a simple online acceptance product, it’s now offering a complete proposition including omni-channel without (yet) needing to own the acquiring infrastructure beneath it. The future may be riskier. Managing the €350m European expansion at the same time as digesting its €1.1bn acquisition of GoCardless will be a significant challenge