Lloyds Cardnet returns to growth

Lloyds Cardnet, the bank’s merchant services joint venture with Fiserv, returned to growth in 2025 although the recovery came at a price. Volume grew for the first time since 2020, cashflow was strong and the business was able to pay a dividend to its parents. But income per transaction fell sharply. 

Cardnet is owned 51% by Lloyds and 49% by Fiserv and mainly serves the bank’s business customers in the UK. The P&L is almost pure merchant acquiring. Technical costs are recharged to Fiserv which processes the transactions and provides gateway, terminals and Clover ePOS. People, sales and marketing costs are recharged to the bank. 

Following four years of declines, total processed volume rose 10% in 2025 to £57bn but sits well below the £66bn recorded in 2021. Management points to wins in food, drink, entertainment, retail and travel. Total transactions were up 18% but there is a long way to go to recover Cardnet’s previous position. Recent wins in the travel sector, notably Ryanair, should certainly help. So should new partnership deals with PayPoint and EPOS Now. However, Lloyds Bank’s new tie-up with Stripe for small business products suggests that the Cardnet JV may increasingly focus on enterprise merchants.

Bar chart illustrating Lloyds Cardnet transaction volume in billion pounds for debit and credit from 2020 to 2025, alongside a line graph showing net fee income per transaction.

Cardnet splits out debit and credit processing. Debit has caused most of the pain in recent years. Despite growing 9% in 2025 to £41bn, debit volumes are well below the peak of £54bn in 2021. In contrast, credit has performed much better and reached a record level of £16.5bn in 2025. 

Average transaction value fell 6% to £54. This explains why 18% transaction growth only delivered 10% volume growth. 

Line graph showing average transaction value in pounds for Lloyds Cardnet from 2020 to 2025, with separate lines for credit and debit transactions.

Despite the higher processed volumes, net fee and commission income grew just 2% to £54m. Cardnet’s unit margins continue to be squeezed, possibly by the addition of volume from large enterprise clients. Net fee income per transaction fell 13% to 5.1p. 

Margins were boosted by much improved settlement-related interest income which doubled to £6m. The bottom line was also helped by much lower fraud provisions which fell from £3.5m to £1.7m.

Good cost control saw total expenses falling 10% to £36m. This includes £17.8m recharged to Lloyds for salary and related costs, down 3% on the previous year and £11.5m towards Cardnet’s “strategic investment programme.” Fiserv received £15.4m, roughly in line with previous years. 

Bar chart showing Lloyds Cardnet's net income and profit before tax in millions of pounds from 2020 to 2025.

Profit before tax was up 51% to £23.7m. Having missed a payment in 2024, the JV was able to pay a dividend of £31m to its parents.

Cardnet is winning again. Volumes and transactions have returned to growth and there have been significant merchant wins. But it’s earning less from that activity: a very healthy 18% increase in transactions yielded just 2% more net fee income. Yet, profits rose strongly in 2025 as interest income, lower costs and lower fraud losses compensated for weaker acquiring economics.

Newsletter – September 2026

Business of Payments – September 2026

A person standing at a podium

Description automatically generated

It’s been a busy summer in the payment business as the major players gave their first half updates. They are telling a consistent story. Modern PSPs with developer-friendly technology are attracting the best, fastest-growing customers. The incumbents are left servicing the old economy and growing slowly, if at all.


Opportunities

I’ve been approached by investors looking to make acquisitions in the UK and Europe. Get in touch if you’re looking to sell either:

  • Payment gateway, ISO or small merchant acquirer with >€200m monthly volume
  • Retail or restaurant POS software with established merchant base

For a confidential introductory conversation, drop me an email: geoff@barracloughandco.com


The payment business

Stripe has continued it stunning success story. According to its August shareholder letter, it grew net revenue 41% in H1 2026. Stripe now processes for every single one of the 25 fastest growing software vendors and 44 of the Forbes AI 50. Blimey.

Payments remains the product anchor but Stripe is positioning itself as the infrastructure of the new economy. Stripe paid $8bn for OpenRouter, a platform which connects developers with AI models and which is growing at 9% per month. OpenRouter charges 5% commission and already processes on Stripe which, as Simon Taylor explains, gives Stripe a 7.5% take rate on the AI economy. Blimey again.

Business of Payments | Geoffrey Barraclough | Substack

Stripe has been hiring to support this growth including job titles such as “Forward Deployed AI Accelerator.” I think this means “sales engineer.” Let me know if I’m wrong.

Line graph comparing AI hiring trends for Stripe and Adyen between August 2025 and August 2026, showing an increase in unique AI roles over time.

Figure 1 Credit: PCN Insights

The AI market is at a very early stage and it’s hard to see these economics holding as companies grow and competitors sense an opportunity to take share from Stripe. For example, OpenAI is now dual-sourcing its processing with a new agreement with Adyen which covers ChatGPT’s subscription sales. The more complex metered token billing stays with Stripe.

That deal was announced as part of another very positive set of results for Adyen in H1with volume up 24% to €804bn and net revenue up 19% to €1.3bn. Adyen reports all segments and all geographies are growing nicely. EMEA, up 15%, was the slowest growing region, possibly reflecting weak consumer spending in Germany and elsewhere.

Adyen’s management has surprised the market this year with two acquisitions – Orb (complex billing for AI companies) and Talon.One (loyalty) – at a combined cost of €1bn. Although the deals will add just €25-50m revenue in 2027, these capabilities help position Adyen for two large new merchant segments – grocery and AI. Orb gives Adyen the right to play with the AI natives which, today, are typically associated with Stripe.

Line graph showing Adyen's net revenue by geography in billion euros from H1 2021 to H1 2026, with data for EMEA, North America, Asia Pacific, and Latin America.

In general, payment companies have reported little impact from the ongoing conflict in the Middle East but Shift4 – new owner of the Global Blue tax-free shopping business – said reduced international travel was hitting sales by c.$20m a quarter. And Global Payments took a $31m Q2 net revenue hit from regional airline clients inherited from Worldpay.

Global Payments has given some insight into the combined Worldpay/Global business. An analysis of its H1 results shows that legacy Global is mainly SMB and highly profitable. In contrast, legacy Worldpay is stronger in enterprise but less profitable in all segments and losing money in SMB. There’s clearly a big margin improvement play available for Global’s management. More on the Business of Payments blog.

Bar chart showing New GPN segment income before central costs in millions of dollars for Enterprise, Platforms, and SMB categories, comparing Legacy Global Payments and Legacy Worldpay.

Also on the Business of Payments blog this month:

Flatpay, the fast-growing POS-focused SME vendor, reported revenues tripling to €39m in 2025 as expansion into Germany began to deliver. Flatpay’s prodigious hiring (2,000 staff by June 2026) contributed to an operating loss of €70m. With merchant numbers now exceeding 100,000, management is forecasting 2026 revenues growing to €100-105m while losses widen to €140-150m. Investors are buying the story. Flatpay raised €146m last year at a €1.5bn valuation. More on the Business of Payments blog.

Bar chart showing revenue and operating profit for Flatpay in 2024 and 2025, with values in millions of euros.

Flatpay is a high-profile member of the “tap pack” – a well-financed group of SME-focused POS payment PSPs expanding across Europe. In other “tap pack” news, Dojo has reached €1bn volume in Italy and SumUp is sponsoring Newcastle United this season. Its marketing team have done a lovely job with this video linking small business, community, football and card payments.

Payment hardware is a tough market. Ingenico revenues were down 11% in 2025, hitting free cashflow and leading to a default on interest payments to bondholders. Apollo, the giant US PE house that was behind the €2.3bn demerger of Ingenico fromWorldline in 2022, has walked away with losses of €600m or more. Now, Ingenico has bought itself some breathing space. Lenders agreed a €150m “capital restructure” that should reduce interest payments to manageable levels. PIMCO and other bondholders have converted €400m of the €1.1bn outstanding debt to equity and injected more cash. Much now depends on the success of Ingenico’s Axium range of Android terminals.

It’s been a quiet summer for corporate activity but Monext, a French PSP owned by Credit Mutuel, has bought Alcineo, a softPOS vendor with 30 employees and €5-10m revenues which supplies 48 clients including myPOS. Monext claims 2,000 clients, €7bn volume and will now have good in-house capability for embedded payments.

In fundraising news, Nopan (geddit?) raised €7.23m to bring card-style payment optimisation tools to A2A and wallets. Nopan is based in Amsterdam, founded by former Netflix payments execs and already has a payment institution licence. Adriaan Mol (founder of Mollie) posted about Nopan on LinkedIn, saying that he thinks it sounds like a stupid investment. I think this is a little harsh. 

ePOS Now, a fast-growing UK-based retail and café software unicorn, has secured £90m bank finance to accelerate its international expansion. Adyen supplies the payments.

Staying in the UK, Kord, a start-up looking to make onboarding easier for regulated businesses including payments, has raised a total of £9m.


AI innovation in merchant acquiring

I’m helping Datos find case studies for a new report. If you’re doing anything innovative with AI and merchant acquiring, please get in touch. 

A digital call for submissions poster titled 'AI Innovation in Merchant Acquiring', emphasizing global research on innovative AI applications for merchant acquiring, inviting banks, non-bank acquirers, and vendors to submit AI solution deployments. It includes examples of innovation categories, a participation guide, and a submission deadline of September 18, 2026.

Software and payments converge

Small merchants across Europe are less and less likely to take payments from their bank. Instead, they are increasingly likely to buy a bundle of payments and software, fronted by their software vendor (ISV). The choice of software drives the choice of payments vendor, not the other way around.

Shopify is the best example. The Canadian commerce platform which hosts webshops for over 3m merchants is now processing c.$75bn a quarter through its Shopify Payments product. This volume primarily goes through Stripe although analysts at UBS report that Shopify has started processing with Adyen for some Shopify Payments transactions in Europe, initially in France and the UK. Margins are thin. UBS estimates Adyen will be getting just 5bps on these transactions.

Line graph displaying Shopify merchant payment volume in billion dollars over time, with a blue line representing Shopify payments and an orange line representing other payment methods, measured on a 4-month moving average.

Following Shopify’s example, most retail or hospitality ISVs have now launched their own payment service. It’s a fast-growing market but we’ve lacked benchmarking data until now. An excellent new research report from Rainforest, which provides a white-label service allowing ISVs to bundle payments with their core product, shows attachment rates varying from 33% to 93%. The data is from the US but increasingly relevant for Europe too. Rainforest concludes that ISVs prize ease of integration above commercial terms and that the successful ones have hired a payment expert in senior management.

A table with numbers and percentages

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Figure 2 Source: Vertical SaaS Embedded Payments, Rainforest

ISVs tend to start their payments journey by simply reselling a product from one of the large processors. Adyen tends to dominate multi-channel uses in Europe but there is space for smaller payment processors with a clear focus on a particular market segment. For example, Unipaas – a London-based PF-as-a-service vendor founded by ex SafeCharge execs – has won three childcare platforms.

But more mature software vendors are increasingly unafraid of moving into financial services themselves. Mews, the fast-growing Amsterdam-based hotel software vendor, has got an EMI licence from the Dutch National Bank.

Beyond payments, many ISVs are looking to provide capital to their merchants. Direct-to-SME lending has been a very difficult category for years but a number of businesses are specialising in providing loans to merchants via software platforms. In Europe, Youlend, Liberis, 365 Finance and Flowpay are among the leaders. Distribution costs are low and the vertical platforms have sufficient data to avoid obviously bad risks.

For more on embedded finance (including payments), I recommend the Embedded Finance Review.

Scheming

Despite political talk of the need for payment sovereignty, Visa and Mastercard continue to grow volume in Europe – up 9% in euros in Q2 according to latest filings. That’s twice the pace of retail sales growth and indicates the Americans are still taking market share from cash and domestic schemes. More on the Business of Payments blog.

chart, bar chart, histogram

Mastercard is reportedly looking to sell Vocalink, the organisation which runs the UK’s core payment infrastructure including instant payments. There have also been rumours that Mastercard will sell Nets Group, which plays a similar role in Denmark. Mastercard’s retreat from A2A is likely to be as much about economics as geopolitics. Vocalink’s sales of £212m grew just 2% in 2025 – equivalent to just 1.5p per transaction or a take rate of 0.2bps. It’s very hard to get rich from direct debits.

Staying in the UK, the Payment Systems Regulator found that Visa and Mastercard “increased their core scheme and processing fees to acquirers by at least 25% since 2017, costing businesses at least £170 million extra per year.” Now, the PSR will force the schemes to publish auditable records of all new pricing decisions.” Acquirers and merchants often feel that many of the fees are slightly random so this will make an interesting read.

#werowatch

Wero, the European Payment Initiative’s wallet based on SEPA Instant, is making steady progress. The werotracker website shows banks now live in four countries – Bunq in the Netherlands being the latest – and over 120 eCommerce merchants now accepting wero.

Bar chart showing the growth of Wero eCommerce merchants from February to July 2026, with a steady increase in the number of merchants over the months.

For wero to succeed, it’s not sufficient to be listed by retailers. New use cases such as this implementation on parking meters by VR Payments in Germany will help. But wero also will need to be promoted to consumers. The EPI won’t be happy with its placement at the foot of Lidl’s checkout page.

Bezahlen bei Lidl: So funktioniert die Zahlung mit Wero

In the early stages, most of wero’s volume will come from the takeover of iDEAL, the very popular bank transfer system in the Netherlands. The migration is going ahead from October. A key consumer benefit is purchasing protection which will be phased in by 2028.

A close-up of a logo

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

This all indicates positive momentum but we’re still awaiting volume or transaction numbers to demonstrate wero is meeting a real consumer need.

Turning to more established domestic schemes, latest numbers show a very mixed performance. In Poland, Blik is still growing strongly; volume was up 18% to €29bn in H1 2026. It’s striking that Blik’s spectacular growth has not come at the expense of cards. eCommerce card volume has almost tripled since 2020.

Line graph displaying eCommerce transaction volume in PLN billion from 2020 to 2026, comparing methods such as Blik, Cards, Open banking, and Pay by links (A2A).

Bancomat, the Italian scheme taken into private equity ownership in 2024, looks to be prospering. According to its annual report, sales were up 63% in 2025 to €85m. Network fees grew 23% but most of the increase came from the new “infrastructure services division” (built by Nexi) which has begun taking processing volume from regional banks.

Bar graph illustrating Bancomat's revenue and profit in millions of euros from 2022 to 2025, with revenue shown in blue and EBIT in green.

In contrast, Girocard, the German scheme, grew volume less than 1% to €152bn in H1 2026 even as the number of terminals rose by 11% to 1.4m. 

Digital euro

The digital euro is increasingly viewed as essential for payment sovereignty although many in the industry are sceptical about whether it genuinely solves a pain point for merchants or shoppers. Rachel Greener looks at the arguments and concludes that, although the digital euro has limited value today, it does bring option value for an increasingly uncertain tomorrow.

Returning to 2026, the EBA has selected 36 PSPs to join a pilot programme. The list includes Adyen, Nexi (which seems particularly excited), Stripe, SumUp and Worldline. The pilot begins late 2027 with full launch scheduled in 2029. With the draft rule book already approaching 1,000 pages (including the annexes), Goran Bosankić explains what vendors need to be doing now.

Open banking

The industry trumpeted the remarkable 100bn API calls made since the competition authorities mandated open banking in 2018. Yet despite the high-profile adoption of open banking payments by Amazon and others earlier this year, the rate of growth dipped in July to 38%. A little over 41m payments were made that month compared to over 2bn debit card transactions. There’s a long way to go.

Bar chart showing UK Open Banking Payments in millions with monthly data from February to July. The blue bars represent total payments, while the orange line indicates the annual change percentage.

Many are hoping that the UK Payments Initiative will come to the rescue by speeding adoption of variable recurring payments, the open banking equivalent of direct debits.

One immediate challenge is that both public and merchants are familiar with direct debits and feel very positively about them. Volume may be hard to shift. Researchers from pay.uk found merchants particularly valued the “direct debit guarantee” which allows consumers to repudiate transactions. The UK PI will need to match this.

Bar chart showing reasons for using Direct Debit payments and their corresponding percentages. Key reasons include easy recurring payments (68%), security for customers (49%), and it being a preferred method (46%). Other reasons include managing missed payments (36%), low cost of acceptance (35%), low chance of failure (33%), cash flow support (29%), low fraud rate (25%), and broader reach (23%), with 1% for other reasons.

Figure 4 Direct debit attitudes. “What drives your usage of direct debits?”

Another challenge is user experience. Open banking fraud levels are low (just 2.4bps of payment volume in Q1 2026) but the headline figure hides a major problem. Most of the fraud is authorised push payment (APP) but the tactics used by banks to minimise APP work directly against the slick user experience open banking needs to compete with cards. Each time a customer is presented a screen asking “do you really want to make this transaction”, the likelihood of a purchase is reduced. At the ACI Payments Unleashed conference in June, the head of payments at Vinted explained why his business was sticking with cards despite the cost advantage of open banking. Each extra customer click cuts conversion rate 25%, he said.

Agentic

Everyone thinks agentic commerce will be big, although nobody knows when. In anticipation of big volumes ahead, the industry is adopting a bewildering array of new standards and partnerships. The latest is the Agentic Payment Alliance featuring Visa and Mastercard.

Yet it’s not clear that consumers are ready to delegate serious buying decisions to agents. Google has pulled back from its “buy for me” proposition, favouring less autonomous shopping experience. For example, Square and Toast have both integrated with Google Maps via Google’s UC protocol to help Americans buy junk food on the way home from work. But this isn’t pure agentic commerce. You have to press “confirm” for each order.

Card payments – flexible and globally accepted – will be relatively easy to adapt to agentic commerce although liability needs some thought. Who should reimburse the consumer if an agent makes a mistake? And there’s a risk of agents overwhelming the industry with disputes, particularly when used for low-value high-frequency purchases. Rivero has a good white paper that lists the issues ahead.

Crypto corner

Stablecoins are much hyped but we’re still waiting for data that demonstrates widespread adoption. Here’s a summary of today’s use of stablecoins in merchant payments.

Starting with uses where a customer pays the merchant in stablecoins, nearly always USDC, Visa’s chain analytics calculates that roughly $6bn per month of stablecoin transactions are “retail sized” – that is, less than $250.

A screenshot of a graph

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

FXC Intelligence calculates that just 0.59% of cross-border consumer-to-business transactions – roughly $29bn annually – are using stablecoins. Shopify now allows its merchants to accept stablecoins in most developed markets although has made no comment on volumes. 

One reason stablecoin acceptance is not growing more quickly is that it’s actually quite complicated for merchants. Rapyd prepared a good deck that lays out the challenges, notably: multiple blockchains, networks, wallets and providers, liquidity spread across different places, FX still happening on both ends, on-ramps and off-ramps that don’t always behave consistently and users who don’t fully trust or understand the flow.

This is one reason why the industry is excited about stablecoin cards. With these (normally Visa) cards, the consumer spends coins, but the merchant is settled in his usual currency. Latest data shows c.$500m a month spent in this way with Hong Kong fintech Redotpay accounting for slightly more than half. Although growing, this is still a drop in the ocean compared to Visa and Mastercard’s combined payment volume of c.$2 trillion each month.

A graph of a bar

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Figure 5 Stablecoin card purchases. Source: Dune

In other news

If your marketing team begins any piece with “In today’s fast-moving landscape, how do you stay ahead?, get a new marketing team. Cokie Hasiotis writes that we need to ban the unreadable corporate slop which pervades LinkedIn and the avalanche of white papers clogging our inboxes. One downside giving your staff access to Co-pilot is the massive increase unreadable B2B content.

Walmart has finally agreed to accept NFC payments in stores. The US grocery giant was the last hold-out against Apple Pay but has bowed to the inevitable. Consumers want to pay with their phones and retailers must accept this.

The state of Florida has named Worldpay and Trustly in legal action against online casinos. It’s increasingly common for processors to be held responsible for their customers. What’s new, and potentially very uncomfortable for the industry, is that the docket also includes Yodlee and Praxis. These payment orchestrators sit outside the money flow and wouldn’t normally be required to run KYC and AML checks.

Weak KYC, poor expense controls. Pymnts reimagines the Odyssey as fintech.

Generated image: Ancient Galley with a Modern Card Reader

Poland is axing its “small payment institution” licence. This was a pro-innovation move by the regulator to encourage start-ups but, in reality, it seems that small PIs “are associated with a very high risk of enabling money laundering and circumvention of sanctions.” There are no shortcuts to compliance.

Dutch research shows people love contactless ticketing on public transport but are very confused about what they are billed and when.

Why are payments always blue? A brand guru looks at the industry, calls for more colourful marketing and praises Mastercard’s easily recognisable palette.

I’m always looking for new uses of payment data but wasn’t expecting Stripe to tell the UK statistics authorities that its numbers of new business formation are wrong.

In Spain, CaixaBank has made 40 benches from plastic recycled from expired bank cards. The benches, which don’t look very comfortable, will be installed in villages across Castilla y Leon where the bank’s mobile branches stop.

The Territorial Director of CaixaBank in Castilla y León, Gerardo Cuartero (centre); the First Vice President of the Provincial Council of Ávila, Jesús Martín (left), and the Mayor of Serranillos, Carlos Cayuela (right), with one of the benches made from recycled cards.

And finally

The Association of Banks in Singapore got in trouble when it began masking parts of users’ names with the letter “X”. “My entire family’s surname just became NSFW (not safe for work),” wrote Facebook user Jeremy See, whose name was displayed as “JERXXX SEX WEX LOXX”. Another user, Ron Foo, wrote: “My name becomes so erotic … FOX SEX POX.”

Bank association 'aware of feedback' after PayNow name masking spells out inappropriate words

Figure 6 Channel News Asia

Flatpay: Growing fast, burning faster

Flatpay, the hyper-aggressive SME payment unicorn from Denmark, has published its 2025 annual report which shows fast growing revenues and widening operating losses. 

Founded in 2022, Flatpay claims to be the fastest growing payment business ever and might be right. In June 2026, the business said it had reached €20bn annual volume at €100m annualised revenue from over 100,000 customers. It’s one of the most successful members of the “tap pack” – a group of start-ups focusing on small shops and restaurants across Europe. This includes Dojo, Viva, myPOS, Square and SumUp.

Focusing on the audited statements for 2025, revenue more than tripled to €39m as Flatpay’s fast-paced European expansion began to deliver results.

Bar chart showing Flatpay's revenue and operating profit for the years 2024 and 2025 in millions of euros. Revenue is represented in blue and operating profit in gray.

Here’s a good podcast in which Sander Janca-Jensen, Flatpay’s founder explains the secrets behind its phenomenal growth.

Sander doesn’t mention Flatpay’s innovative, although controversial, policy of offering merchants free processing of business and international cards funded through a consumer surcharge. Competitors think this is one of the key factors behind its growth and one that could soon be replicated by others in the market.

Flatpay’s expansion is made possible by its ruthlessly simple proposition. One payment terminal (a PAX A920) and one distribution model. All sales are direct sales which means there are no partners to manage or pay commissions to.

Bar chart showing Flatpay revenue projections for 2025 in millions of euros, with Denmark and Germany having the highest revenues, followed by Finland, Italy, and Others.

Looking in more detail, Germany (€15m) has become Flatpay’s largest market although Finland (€6m) and Italy (€4m) have begun to make significant contributions. France, Great Britain and the Netherlands should start delivering in 2026.

Operating losses widened from €20m to €70m. Average FTE jumped from 257 to 957 and staff costs rose by €49m to €69m, almost matching the €50m increase in operating losses. Headcount has continued to rise, reaching 2,000 by June 2026.  

Rapid merchant acquisition consumes capital as well as eating operating cash. At year end, Flatpay had €40m of equipment on its balance sheet – presumably including the stock of payment terminals to be leased to merchants – including  €14m prepaid for future deliveries.  

The total resulting cash burn is startling. Free cash outflow, before financing, was €94m although this was more outweighed by an additional €146m raised during 2025 at a €1.5bn valuation and a €24m loan from Denmark’s Export and Investment Fund.

Flatpay shows every indication of keeping its foot on the accelerator. Management expects revenue to more than double again in 2026 to reach €100-105m but forecasts losses ballooning to €140-150m as the business continues investing heavily in expansion. With customer numbers growing at a remarkable 7% a month, Flatpay is conducting a fascinating experiment in just how quickly a European payments business can be built,  and how much capital it takes to do it.

Nexi – low growth, strong cashflow

Nexi reassured investors with another quarter in which it delivered what it promised: modest growth but strong cashflow. 

Total revenues grew 1.1% in Q2 to €915m. Merchant solutions, the largest division was flat as the impact of new merchant signings was offset by the migration of the Banco BPM portfolio in Italy. This was 140.000 POS terminals lost to Numia.

Issuing grew 1.4%, held back by the continuing migration of a large issuing customer which is bringing processing in-house. 

Digital banking solutions, up 6%, was the best performer, boosted by its role in Zippay, the Irish bank’s quixotic attempt to build a home-grown wero.

Management is very excited to be part of the digital euro programme and has been selected in a consortium run by G&D to provide offline acceptance. Meaningful revenues are many years away but involvement in the ECB’s project nicely positions Nexi at the heart of Europe’s new payment infrastructure.

Line graph depicting Nexi's net revenue in millions of euros over multiple quarters, showing three categories: Merchant solutions, Issuing solutions, and Digital banking solutions, with varying revenue trends across time periods.
Bar chart showing Nexi payment volume in billion euros over several quarters, with a blue bar representing unadjusted total and an orange line indicating annual growth rate.

Merchant solutions revenue was flat in Q2 at €522m despite 5% volume growth, reflecting the BancoBPM loss and pressure on non-transaction revenues. One competitor in Italy (Nexi’s largest market) is drving down hardware margins by offering free payment terminals. Flatpay looks the likely culprit.

Bar graph showing Nexi payment volume in billion euros, with unadjusted totals on the left axis and annual growth rate indicated by an orange line on the right axis, covering multiple quarters.

Management highlighted macro weakness in Germany, citing the redundancies in the automotive sector and higher level of business insolvencies. This has impact volumes in hospitality. Poland continued to be squeezed by pricing pressure in eCommerce. 

On the positive, new customer wins are “growing mid-teens” and the German ISV channel at “about 30%,” helped by migrating Orderbird volume from another acquirer. Nexi took full control of Orderbird, a Berlin-based restaurant software vendor, in 2022, eight years after Concardis first invested, It says concerns about channel conflict mean that Nexi won’t be taking Orderbird outside Germany. 

Nexi presented another quarter of good cost control. Total expenses rose just 2% with personnel expense up 4%.

Nexi isn’t growing much, but it is becoming a formidable cash machine; generating over €400m in H1, ahead of expectations. EBITDA margins stable at 50% and Nexi cut leverage despite paying a €350m dividend in May, redeeming €1bn of debt and spending c.€160m on the Banco Popolare di Sondrio portfolio

Nexi also confirmed to UBS that it recently rejected an offer for Digital Banking Solutions (DBS). Management now believes that digital euro opportunity makes DBS strategic to the group. Meanwhile, investor chatter continues about a possible private-equity bid for Nexi as a whole.

But for the moment, investors are beginning to buy the story. The stock price is up 50% since its all-time low in March with the market capitalisation now standing at almost €5bn. Nexi is no Worldline; but it’s no Adyen either. Even after the recent rally, Nexi still offers a dividend yield of about 7% and trades on an equity free-cash-flow yield of roughly 15%, suggesting the market continues to price in considerable risk.

Global Payments: the Worldpay margin opportunity

The first detailed numbers from the combined Global Payments (GPN) and Worldpay reveal just how different the two businesses are. And the scale of the opportunity if Global can bring Worldpay’s profitability anywhere close to its own.

Global Payments is notoriously discreet with its public disclosures. The 10-Q document has historically given little detail on revenue breakdown by segments or geographies. Very few KPIs are ever published but the H1 26 results do now show worldwide sales and margin numbers from its three reorganised operating units – SMB, platforms and enterprise. 

Global includes Worldpay in its numbers from January 2026 so, by comparing the combined 2026 numbers with legacy Global Payments’ 2025 results, we can estimate the contributions from the Worldpay acquisition for the first time. The precise Worldpay segment margins presented below are estimates, of course, but are directionally accurate and back up a widely held view that Global has bought a structurally different merchant portfolio.

Bar chart illustrating Global Payments revenue for H1 2026 in millions of dollars, comparing Legacy Global Payments and Worldpay across categories: Enterprise, Platforms, and SMB.

My key conclusions are:

SMB – overwhelmingly legacy Global Payments and very profitable, possibly because of its portfolio of software businesses. Worldpay’s rather smaller SMB portfolio appears to be losing money although the numbers do include significant acquisition related intangible amortisation. 25% of Global’s SMB revenue comes from outside the US compared with 45% of Worldpay’s; the vast majority likely to be in the UK. 

Enterprise – overwhelmingly Worldpay although legacy Global has much better margins. The portfolios are quite different: Worldpay enterprise is 80% CNP (eCommerce) but Global is majority (54%) POS.

Platforms – relatively evenly sized but, again, Global has much better profitability. Worldpay platforms is 41% embedded – likely mainly through the Payrix PF as a service proposition. Global is 93% traditional integrated payments.  

Bar chart showing New GPN segment income before central costs in millions of dollars, comparing Global Payments and Worldpay across three categories: Enterprise, Platforms, and SMB.

Improving Worldpay’s margins will be a key focus for the new management team. The prize is substantial. Business of Payments estimates that closing just half the margin gap between Worldpay and the legacy Global businesses could add close to $1bn of annual segment income. Global itself is targeting $600m of annual Worldpay integration expense synergies by the end of 2028. This won’t be easy; not least because almost half of Worldpay’s SMB business is in the UK which (according to Global’s CEO) “is kind of struggling from a macro standpoint. And certainly, we’re seeing a little bit of softness in the UK market.” 

Bar graph comparing segment margins of New Global Payments before central costs, highlighting Enterprise, Platforms, and SMB categories.

Commenting on the enterprise segment, Global’s management had some good news as the company has gone live with processing at two large UK supermarkets – Morrisons and Aldi. Less positively, Global Payments is one of the few payments companies reporting a significant impact from the Middle East turmoil, with a $31m Q2 net revenue hit from airline clients inherited with Worldpay. 

These initial numbers show why Global Payments was so keen to buy Worldpay. It has acquired considerable additional scale, particularly in enterprise, but at much lower margins than its legacy businesses. If management can close even part of that profitability gap, the financial upside is substantial. The challenge will be doing so while simultaneously consolidating platforms, developing new products, retaining customers and managing all the personnel issues that come with such a massive merger.

Visa and Mastercard: Still winning in Europe

Despite increasing political focus on payment sovereignty, total payment volume growth from the American schemes in Europe picked up a little in Q2 according to the latest financial results from Visa and Mastercard. 

Total volume rose 12% in dollars (9% in euros) to a combined €1.47 trillion. This is slight uptick after six quarters of declining growth rates but well below the consistent double digits we saw through 2023 and 2024. Nonetheless, 9% volume growth is 2-3 times nominal GDP growth and roughly double nominal consumer spending growth. This indicates that Visa and Mastercard remain key beneficiaries of the secular shift towards digital money.

Bar chart showing scheme payment volume in Europe from 2023 to Q2 2026, comparing Visa and Mastercard volumes, with an overlay line indicating the combined growth rate percentage.

Visa maintained its slight lead over Mastercard with volume of €749bn vs €721bn. Overall average transaction value was flat at €33.50.

Both schemes also report cash transactions – mainly withdrawals from ATMs – and these have proved remarkably resilient. But the headline figure of €285bn of cash transactions in Q2 masks changing consumer behaviour. People are taking out more cash less often. A fall of 9% in the number of transactions was almost entirely offset an increase in ATV to €285. 

Bar chart showing Visa and MCI combined cash transactions in Europe from Q2 2023 to Q2 2026, with total volume (in billion euros) represented by blue bars and average transaction value (ATV) displayed as a gray line.

Globally, the lucrative cross-border card payment market keeps growing, up 12% in constant dollars in Q2. Despite the Middle East disruption, commercial transactions were buoyant and inbound spending by foreigners in the US continued to improve, boosted by the World Cup in June. Visa reported that card present transactions in host cities were up 20% on match days; notably contactless payments in mass transit.

Mastercard added that impacts from the instability in the Middle East moderated throughout the second quarter and were less severe than anticipated. Wealthy residents of the impacted GCC countries, have begun spending more money abroad.  

The growth numbers tell only half the story. Behind the scenes, the real battle is for issuers, where both schemes continue to invest heavily in winning new issuing mandates. In Q2, both schemes trumpeted new client wins in Europe that will deliver more cards, or credentials as they are now often called. Yet there seems some evidence they are becoming more disciplined about the economics of portfolio wins.

Line graph showing the number of cards issued in Europe from Q2 2023 to Q2 2026, comparing Visa and Mastercard. Visa cards are represented in dark blue and show a gradual increase, while Mastercard cards are in orange, also showing an upward trend.

Visa says that through portfolio migrations and organic expansion it has added more than 40 million European cards in the last 12 months and say that a further 30 million are in the pipeline. Visa recently won “the entire consumer credit portfolio” of Natwest’s retail bank and says it expects to continue to win debit business from domestic schemes such as Giro in Germany and Carte Bancaire in France. These local players are now investing in new features such as pre-authorisations, pay-outs and Apple Pay support but have been slow to modernise, leaving a gap for Visa and Mastercard to grow their debit business in Europe. 

This explains why Mastercard is serious about replacing the old-fashioned Maestro with feature-rich Mastercard Debit. The number of Maestros issued fell 19% to 271m. 

Bar graph showing the number of Maestro cards in millions from Q2 2023 to Q2 2026, with a general decline over time.

Mastercard says it “flipped” Eurobank’s entire consumer and commercial portfolios in Greece and is working with Santander in the UK to accelerate cross-border spend through targeted marketing campaigns. Michael Miebach, Mastercard’s CEO says he has refused European issuing deals which don’t make financial sense, including Lloyds Bank’s credit portfolio. He added: “winning share of a portfolio which is growing at 1% helps me in the first year and then is a huge drag on growth for the years thereafter.”

Both schemes discussed the impact of AI on their operations. Visa says that it has changed its product development model. Instead of teams of ten people, product development is now carried out by “nimble agentic squads” of two to four staff. This delivers “80% more code commits and 80% plus improvement in requirement definition from 30 days to 5 days, which has translated to 65% plus faster feature development.” This improved productivity, helped Visa ship more than 300 major product releases over last 12 months. Result: an announcement of layoffs impacting 7% of its global headcount, with most cuts landing on technology and product teams.

Today’s stablecoins look complicated and there’s a clear opportunity for the schemes to bring the scale, security and interoperability necessary for mass-market adoption. Although stablecoins have clear utility in global treasury and possibly some B2B and P2P flows, they seem unlikely to make many inroads into merchant payments. “There’s no problem to solve,” says Michael Miebach, Mastercard’s CEO. He added that its crypto co-brand volume had more than tripled over the last 2 years although didn’t give figures. 

Both schemes are investing in stablecoin capability, mainly related to settlement. Mastercard has acquired BVNK, giving it a ready-made stablecoin infrastructure business serving merchants, PSPs and finTechs. Visa has instead built Visa Stablecoin Platform in-house, targeting banks and payment institutions with a platform integrated into Visa’s existing network. VSP will integrate with Visa’s very successful Pismo card issuing platform, likely making the whole proposition very attractive to its bank customers.

Visa and Mastercard are both key members of the new Open Standard initiative which will issue the Open USD stablecoin. Many think that Open USD is going after Circle and Tether (the businesses behind the two leading stablecoins today) but Ryan McInerney, Visa’s CEO says that “Visa going forward will remain multi-coin, multi chain. Our role is not to pick winners.

Visa’s Cybersource eCommerce gateway has launched a “unified checkout” which orchestrates multiple payment types. 4.500 sellers and acquirers have enabled unified checkout including one of the largest acquirers in the UK; most likely to be Barclaycard Payments. And Corpay will adopt Visa’s Fleet 2.0 solution for its fuel card platform in Europe.

In litigation news Visa has been granted leave to appeal the UK Competition Appeals Tribunal decision on Interchange. Less positively, a group of merchants has filed a claim at the UK high court alleging interchange fees are an unlawful restriction and seeking damages dating back to 2019. Mastercard’s trial in Portugal for similar allegations is set for October. 

Finally, neither scheme provided meaningful evidence that agentic commerce is yet generating material payment volumes. Maybe we’ll learn more in Q3 but I suspect I suspect meaningful payment volumes remain at least another year away.

Santander Payment Solutions: From scepticism to success

Four years ago, I wasn’t convinced Santander could turn a collection of disparate payments assets into a coherent platform but the latest results suggest it has done exactly that. Santander is now a rare European bank making a success of merchant payments, delivering consistent growth and rewarding shareholders with eight successive quarters of profitability.

It’s not been an easy journey. Santander first put its payment assets together in 2020 under the PagoNxt brand and bought Wirecard’s tech platform and Munich operations. The result: an alphabet soup of brands and €170m write-offs.  

The business is much clearer now. PagoNxt has been renamed Santander Payment Solutions and consists of three divisions:

  • Getnet merchant acquiring, active in Iberia and Latin America
  • Getnet Platforms, including A2A and Santander’s issuing processing which services the group’s retail businesses in Brazil, Mexico, Chile, Spain and the UK
  • Ebury, London-based trade finance specialists which has long been a candidate for IPO

With 1.2m merchant customers, Getnet is the division that most interests readers of Business of Payments. Getnet Payment volume grew an impressive 17% in Q2 to €67bn, and has roughly doubled since 2021.

Getnet offers a single API to connect to its Latin American markets which helps international merchants easily navigate multi-market entry. This was one reason for improved performance in Mexico and Brazil. The latter despite the rapid growth of PIX, which has yet to make a meaningful dent in card acquiring.

Recent product enhancements include “Pay In” for Brazil which allows international merchants to receive payments without establishing a legal entity in the country, DCC in Mexico and white-labelling AEVI’s POS platform (initially in Mexico) which will help secure business from large retailers. 

The total number of transactions, including both Getnet acquiring and Getnet platforms,  rose to 8.6bn in Q2 26, up 48% year on year, largely driven by increased A2A activity in Brazil. This number may well be associated with PIX.

Santander management has highlighted the importance of scale in driving down unit costs. This strategy is working. Cost per transaction for the half year was 1.6c compared with 2.9c a year ago and 3.6c in 2024. 

A report on H1 2026 performance of global payment platforms, highlighting revenue growth and profitability improvements. Key figures include €129 billion TPV for Getnet, a 10% increase, 9 million transactions for Getnet Platforms, a 5x increase, and a 28% rise in active customers for Ebury, totaling 28,000. The report emphasizes a strong rise in transactions and transactional cost efficiencies.

Figure 1: Santander Payment Solutions Q2 26 results slide

The improved unit economics has begun to flow to the bottom line.

Bar chart displaying the revenue and net operating income of Santander Payment Solutions over several quarters, indicating consistent profitability.

Net revenue grew 19% to €387m, expenses were up 16% to €337m reflecting continued platform investments and net operating income rose 46% to €51m. The operating margin is a very respectable 13%. Cash performance is even better. Santander Payment Solutions generated EBITDA of €123m in Q2 26, a healthy 32% margin.

Santander has proved it can build a profitable merchant acquiring platform. The next challenge is to turn Getnet from a regional champion into a genuinely pan-European proposition. That means expanding beyond its traditional Iberian and Latin American strongholds and strengthening its merchant offering in markets where the bank has a major presence such as the UK and Poland.

Mollie: Well run, ambitious and making two big bets

Mollie is one of Europe’s fastest-growing payment companies. Its 2025 annual report, posted at the Dutch Chamber of Commerce, shows a business executing well operationally, but about to embark on a far riskier phase.

Gross revenue was up 31% to €274.3 and net revenue (after deducting processing costs) grew 23% to €156m. That’s the old Mollie. The company is now being transformed with a €350m plan for pan-European expansion at the same time as closing its €1.1bn acquisition of London-based GoCardless.

Bar chart showing Mollie Group BV revenue and profit in million euros for 2022, 2024, and 2025, with net revenue in blue and operating income in gray.

“We’re here to eliminate financial bureaucracy,” says Mollie, positioning itself as the one-stop shop for European SMEs. Adrian Mol, who founded the business and named it after himself, believes there is a substantial opportunity to build a true European payment champion. You could characterise Mollie as an Adyen for SMEs with its full stack of products including online and POS payment acceptance, omnichannel reporting and support for complex use cases such as  marketplaces, franchises and embedded payments for software vendors. 

Mollie depends on its acquiring partners, Checkout.com and Rapyd, for processing. This keeps capex low, reduces the compliance overhead and simplifies expansion into new markets. But leaves Mollie with less control over authorisation optimisation and interchange economics than vertically integrated acquirers such as Stripe, Adyen and Checkout.

Despite the launch of a number of payment-adjacent products including lending (partnering Youlend), business accounts and loyalty, over 90% of turnover came from payment processing on behalf of over 250.000 merchant customers. “Capital revenue”, likely to be mainly commission income from merchant cash advances more than doubled to €5.7m. This could form the basis for an important new business line.

Although Mollie has begun to internationalise, the vast majority of revenue came from its heartland of Benelux (€165m) and DACH (€63.9m). Sales from other geographies (including the UK) grew more slowly, up 19% to €46m.

Bar chart showing Mollie Group BV revenue by geography for the years 2023, 2024, and 2025, with categories for Benelux, DACH, Rest of Europe including the UK, and Rest of World.

This may change soon as Mollie is well funded and has big plans. Management says the business is now operational in all 30 countries of the EEA plus the UK and will invest €350m in building out its product offer and team across Europe. Mollie has set up “regional development hubs” in Milan, Stockholm and Warsaw. Lisbon is coming soon. 

The €350m investment excludes the Netherlands (Mollie’s home market) and the UK where it is making a major strategic move in buying GoCardless. The price is €1.1bn in stock, a rather generous 6x multiple of GoCardless’s 2025 revenues. The combined group is valued at €4.1bn (according to Mollie) and has moved its domicile to the UK while keeping tax residency in the Netherlands.

Bar graph showing GoCardless revenue breakdown (£m) from 2021 to 2025, comparing revenue from the UK & Ireland and the Rest of the world.

GoCardless is growing more slowly than Mollie – sales were up 18% to £155m in 2025, despite its acquisition of Nuapay, a leading direct debit provider. GoCardless is losing money and in need of capital despite having raised a total of $600m. Swapping GoCardless equity for Mollie’s stock looks sensible for GoCardless shareholders but it is less obvious why Mollie’s investors should be enthusiastic. Mollie is growing nicely with a clear path to profitability and a stronger balance sheet. Building A2A capability internally would likely be rather cheaper than paying the equivalent of €11,000 per GoCardless merchant. Possibly the prize is an opportunity to cross-sell card processing to the large UK GoCardless base. 

Bar graph showing the net revenues in millions of euros for Mollie and GoCardless in 2025, with categories for Mollie card processing, Other Mollie, Nuapay (bank payments), and GoCardless (A2A).

Returning to Mollie’s 2025 results, costs were well contained and are growing proportionally to revenues. Administrative expenses rose 28% to €159m including a 19% increase in staff expenses to €106m. Employee numbers rose 16% to 857 at an average cost of €125K each. 

Mollie looks to be running a tight ship. Expected credit losses were €2.7m, a steady 2% of net revenue which is very reasonable for an SME book. Chargeback provisions grew slightly to €2.9m indicating that Mollie is sticking with low-risk merchants. Operating losses slipped to €19m from €9m in 2024.  

Mollie has been one of the stand-out successes in European payments over the past few years. Beginning with a simple online acceptance product, it’s now offering a complete proposition including omni-channel without (yet) needing to own the acquiring infrastructure beneath it. The future may be riskier. Managing the €350m European expansion at the same time as digesting its €1.1bn acquisition of GoCardless will be a significant challenge 

More pain for PayPoint

PayPoint’s merchant services business is still struggling. In the year to March 2026, net revenue fell 2.5% as payment volume declined 6.2% to £6.4 billion. The revenue decline comes despite product enhancements including SoftPOS and an improved merchant portal.

Bar chart showing Paypoint merchant services volume (£m) over time, with blue bars representing Handepay, orange bars for PayPoint, and a yellow line indicating the take rate.

PayPoint remains under pressure from the “tap pack” of dynamic POS-focused providers offering modern terminals, slick support and integrated bundles of software and payments to SMEs. Competitors such as Flatpay, SumUp, myPOS, Dojo, Square continue to reshape the UK market. And ePOS vendors such as EPOS Now are now also taking market share in payments through partnerships with Adyen and others.

The pain is most pronounced on PayPoint’s core acquiring estate (powered by Lloyds Cardnet and typically integrated with PayPoint’s EPOS), where payment volume fell 9.6%. Handepay, the ISO acquired for £70 million in 2021, performed somewhat better, with volume down 4.6%. Handepay primarily resells Global Payments’ acquiring services.

Management is now repositioning the merchant services business towards larger SMEs and the mid-market, where it believes profitability will be stronger. Rather than chasing merchant numbers, the company says it will focus on “net revenue, improved profitability and a merchant estate managed for value rather than estate growth.”  This is reflected in a sharply improved take rate – up 4bps to 0.52%.

Slide titled 'Merchant Services – strategic reset of business' outlining a new strategy focusing on higher value SMB growth and mid-market growth in card acquiring.

PayPoint has stopped publishing merchant numbers, although management says the business serves around 10,000 merchants on its core estate and a further 20,000 through Handepay.

Elsewhere, the picture is more positive. Merchant Rentals, the terminal leasing business acquired with the Handepay deal, is gaining traction through a new partnership with FreedomPay. More than 1,000 devices are already deployed. Merchant cash advances, provided through YouLend, grew strongly, with loan volumes up 39% to £33 million.

Open banking has begun to make a meaningful contribution following the OB Connect acquisition. Revenues reached £4.2 million, making PayPoint one of the larger UK players in the sector. Management highlighted new business wins including DWP, AccessPay, Gousto and the Insolvency Service.

But overall, these results underline how quickly the SME acquiring market is changing. Legacy providers built around a simple terminal + card acquiring proposition are increasingly being challenged by software-led competitors whose economics and customer proposition look fundamentally different.

Newsletter – July 2026

It’s almost four years since I launched Business of Payments, and we’ve just crossed the 5.000 subscriber mark. That’s much more than I was expecting for such a niche publication! Thanks for reading and I hope you enjoy this month’s edition.

The payment business

Adyen announced its second acquisition in as many months. Having spent ten years marketing the advantages of having a single platform, it now has three. The latest purchase is Orb, provider of modern billing systems (or “revenue design”) to the coolest Californian start-ups. The price is $335m in cash. Unlike SaaS, which charges per seat, AI charges based on usage which means billing can get complicated, very quickly. Orb manages the complexity.

Although Adyen could have built modern billing capability in-house, the real prize is Orb’s customer base. Stripe is the go-to processor for fast-growing AI start-ups and Orb gives Adyen immediate credibility in this sector.

Worldline’s spring clean rolled into high summer with the announcement that Credit Agricole will take full control of CAWL, the two companies’ joint venture in France. CAWL was launched with a big fanfare in 2024 but had struggled to meet its targets or even launch a product. I’m told that Credit Agricole’s member banks were never fully committed to the JV, resulting in lower than expected sales to SMEs. And, Worldline wasn’t able to win the big tenders with larger merchants.

Checkout.com wants to raise its profile, possibly to support its one-click competitor to Stripe Connect and has put serious dollars behind a new above the line campaign. There’s a nice creative idea focusing on the company’s current invisibility.

Revolut’s annual review claims merchant acquiring volume tripled for the second year in a row. It didn’t publish numbers but the neo bank is serious about merchant services for small businesses and should do well. Revolut terminals are now available in 19 countries and it’s also providing online payment acceptance, like here with Pepita.com in Hungary. One of Revolut’s USPs should be the ability to process “on us” transactions from its customers using Revolut Pay.

There’s never a good time for an outage but Worldpay didn’t need the high-profilefailure it suffered during one of England’s world cup matches. In total, there were 2.5 hours of disrupted service caused as “power was momentarily lost to one of our data centres. This caused the network to restart, which intermittently impacted merchants’ transaction authorisations and tokenisation.”

Large acquiring outages remain surprisingly rare, making this one particularly embarrassing. You can read the full incident report circulated to Worldpay’s clientswho will be hoping that the takeover of Worldpay by Global Payments is not disrupting resilience planning.

Several German payment executives have been charged in connection with Operation Chargeback – an investigation in alleged handling of fraudulent transactions by PSPs including Unzer and PayOne. Prosecutors say criminals made more than €300 million by signing cardholders to fake porn, dating or other sites.

The alleged criminality ended in 2021 when, following the Wirecard scandal, the German regulator began taking an interest. The German PSPs are all under new management and have cleaned up their books but the charges are a timely reminder that PSPs need to know who their customers are and what they are doing.

Flatpay has been the recent stand-out success of European payments, having reached €30bn annualised payment volume in just four years. Distribution is old-school field sales. No partnerships. Listen to Sander Janca-Jensen, Flatpay’s founder, talk toMichele Mattei.

Fundraising

Total payments fundraising in Europe was flat in the first half of 2026 at €409maccording to Blackfintech. The analysts see “payment orchestration winding down while agentic payments emerge” citing big investments in Paymentology and Primer. Judge for yourself. Here are this month’s highlights:

BR-DGE, an Edinburgh-based payment orchestrator has raised £10m. Management says the business will be processing 100m transactions a month by year end from customers such as William Hill and First Group.

Innovorder, a French restaurant software group has raised €20m for European expansion through acquisition. Yavin provides the integrated payment proposition which includes SoftPOS. Innovorder isn’t the only business wanting to become Europe’s Toast – you may have seen Olo raise last month – but national differences remain a significant blocker to European scale.

Paymove, based in Poland, has raised a further €2m to take its QR-based unattended POS payment proposition to Spain, Portugal and Italy. Paymove has a clean, quick user experience and has built a good position with car parking in its home market.

Nepting, the Montpelier-based POS payment platform, has raised an undisclosed sum to expand outside France move and move into eCommerce. Nepting currently provides terminals, local software and transaction routing focusing on complex, multi-site retail such as SNCF and Burger King. The business made €23m revenues in 2025 from €70bn processed across 350.000 sites and connects to Fiserv, Planet and “all the French acquirers.” The fundraise is a strong vote of confidence in Nepting which (alongside Aevi, Bluefin andFreedomPay) is one of the few independent POS platforms remaining.

Paypercut, a Bulgaria-based online payment gateway founded by former SumUp execs, has raised an additional €5m, in part to support the application for an EMI licence in Ireland. Paypercut has repositioned itself from a BNPL aggregator to a more generalist orchestrator for central and eastern Europe. EU cards are 1.29% + €0.10. Paynetics provides the processing.

Yamsoft, from Lithuania, has raised €2.35m to commercialise its suite of AI-payment infrastructure for PSPs. Modules include dynamic payment routing, PSP integration and smart reconciliation.

In Dublin, Trustap has raised $10m to launch a solution to make marketplace listings fully transactable by AI agents.

It’s rare to see technology companies raise bank financing but EPOS Now has secured up to £90m from HSBC. The money will go on product investment and international expansion. For payments, EPOS Now works mainly with Adyen.

Meet the substackers

I’m co-hosting some Fintech drinks in London on 16 July alongside the capital’s leading substackers. Join me Matt JonesJas ShahMike Chambers and Andrew Marshall for independent commentary, conversations and unparalleled networking. 

Open banking

Britain welcomed the first new payment scheme in a generation. The UK Payments Initiative has been founded to kick-start open banking payments with 23 businesses investing, including 13 banks.

UKPI delivers two critical things which were previously missing for open banking payments – a rule book and a commercial model. For the snappily named “commercial variable recurring payments (cVRPs)”, banks will get 5.5p per transaction. The UKPI receives 2.5p per transaction as “scheme fees”, funded equally by the processors and banks.

UKPI’s launch is restricted to low risk transactions to government, financial services and charities. General retail eCommerce will come in the next phase and will include a third critical success factor – consumer protection.

The only thing missing from UKPI is a brand or acceptance mark. Without this, every vendor will continue calling open banking payments something different and shoppers will remain confused. I’m told that some players remain hopeful of establishing their own consumer payment brand and have blocked UKPI from establishing its own acceptance mark. This isn’t just a UK problem. Stefan Holscher makes a strong case for pan-European “pay by bank” brand.

One final point. Speaking to merchants that have already included open banking at checkout, I’m told there’s a wildly divergent acceptance rate depending on the shopper’s bank. Starling, Monzo and Revolut convert very well. Nationwide and other long established UK banks impose more difficult customer journeys, and their shoppers are discouraged. Result: merchants may be unwilling to turn on open banking payments for all banks which could slow adoption of open banking, despite UKPI’s best efforts.

There’s a long way to go. Open banking payments remain very small compared to debit although transactions picked up in May for the first acceleration in growth in almost a year.

Scheming

The USA may be out of the World Cup but Ted Lasso is still very much in the game. This is a great commercial from Visa.

While wero is still in heavy investment mode, one local scheme is making money. Blik, the wildly popular Polish payment standard, reported revenue up 18% at €115m. That’s equivalent to a take rate of €0.05 or 0.14%. Operating profit fell 10% as the business invested heavily in marketing and international expansion. 16% of revenue is now generated outside Poland, notably Slovakia and Romania.

Blik is jointly owned by Mastercard and six Polish banks. An IPO is thought likely soon.

Giro, under pressure from the rapid growth in Visa and Mastercard debit in Germany, announced new features including pre-authorisation (vital for hotels and car hire) and in-app payments. SumUp, which has recently started accepting Giro, says it accounts for 60% of POS transactions where offered.

In Denmark, the competition authority ruled that Dankort (the local debit scheme) was unlawfully issuing business cards. Result: 90% of business cards are now issued on Visa or Mastercard. This is more expensive for merchants and driving renewed interest in surcharging at POS.

Bizum, Spain’s successful mobile payment scheme, has launched at POS but the experience is complicated. Merchants can only choose two PSPs. at launch. Paycomet, Sabadell’s merchant services arm or Monei, which both offer QR or pay-by-link

Werowatch

Along with the digital euro, wero – the mobile wallet managed by the European Payments Initiative – is the continent’s response to the growing need for payment sovereignty. The urgency was underlined by US action to terminate Visa and Mastercard transactions in Cuba.

Wero is making steady progress. Two Austrian banks will join EPI as shareholdersadding another country to wero’s reach. And we’ve seen a steady flow of PSPs joining the EPI including ACI and Nopan; the latter an interesting Dutch GoCardless-clone founded by former Netflix execs.

The unofficial werotracker website shows a steady increase in the number of merchants accepting Europe’s new payment wallet, although it remains far from a mass-market proposition.

German tourists arriving in Spain were greeted by this large billboard suggesting they send money to friends via wero. The headline reads “what happens in Malaga gets settled in Malaga.” The locals were outraged that wero appeared to be condoning bad behaviour by German tourists. The German savings banks, who were behind the creative, apologised.

Software and payments converge

I spoke with Tomas Debnar, founder of Papaya POS, a restaurant-focused ISV based in Bratislava for MPE. Papaya already offers embedded consumer payments (via Global Payments and Tatra Banka) and is extending its offer into B2B payments via a procurement marketplace. You can watch the webinar below or read the summary on the Business of Payments blog.

Agentic Commerce

Conferences and seminars are buzzing with speculation about if or when AI agents will start buying products on their own initiative. I moderated a panel at ACI’s Payments Unleashed event, featuring execs from Nvidia and PayPal as well as from our hosts. Credit to the organisers for inviting Lord Holmes, a UK Conservative politician who speaks on technology. I’ve posted a summary of the debate on the Business of Payments blog.

While many payment businesses are using AI today to help with fraud screening and transaction routing (Checkout published an admirably clear explanation of its use of AI to optimise payment acceptance for its customers), we’re some distance from true agentic commerce. There are considerable technical, cultural and regulatory hurdles to jump first.

Adyen’s head of agentic commerce gave a revealing interview“Infrastructure is a much bigger block than folks thought about,” he said.

Matt Jones says consumers just aren’t readyEven when they are ready, agentic commerce doesn’t really work today. Read what happened when Andrew Dresner asked AI to buy him a pair of boots.

Much vendor activity is probably best characterised as innovation theatre; good for a press release and slide in a corporate sales deck but not a mass-market product. This month’s highlights include the first agentic transaction in France which involved Worldline, Credit Agricole and Mastercard.

My view is that we’re likely to see agents making purchases first within walled gardens, such as Amazon’s new Rufus product but also that the industry focus on retail is wrong-headed. I wouldn’t ask ChatGPT to buy me a shirt, but I would be very happy to have AI switch my electricity supplier whenever a better tariff was available.

Longer term, there are growing fears that neither consumers nor businesses will be willing to pay the true cost of using AI once investors stop subsidising the technology. The numbers are quite frightening.

Fraud

Payment fraud is well researched and we’re seeing a consistent theme: real people are becoming a problem. Good customers are becoming fraudsters.

Visa’s 2026 Global eCommerce Payments & Fraud research shows friendly fraud (merchants being scammed by their own customers) is a major trend. Adyen’s “Fraud’s identity crisis” says good customers “have learned to game the system,” citing growing worries about returns abuse. Ravelin takes the argument further and highlights what it calls “the democratisation of deception.” 65% of consumers say AI has made it easier to falsely claim refunds.

Understanding consumer intent will become ever more important which requires sharing information between the various parts of the payment ecosystem – issuer, network, PSP and merchant.

Visa has tried to clamp down on fraud with its VAMP programme. This penalises acquirers whose merchants generate high levels of fraudulent or disputed transactions. Visa’s product team tells me that the VAMP ratio (fraud + disputes) has fallen by 10% quarter-on-quarter and that one half of acquirers enrolled in the programme have already hit their targets. “Remediation,” as Visa calls it, can usually be achieved with simple best practice – CVV checks, network tokens, refusing PAN key entry and stronger velocity controls. Interestingly, remediated acquirers have grown payment volume twice the rate of non-remediated ones. This indicates that issuers had been declining good transactions from acquirers with a bad record on fraud and disputes.

Merchant cash advance

Merchant cash advance (AKA embedded finance) is growing fast but a small number of providers are securing partnerships with the main PSPs. YouLend is powering Buckaroo Capital, making financing available to its 54,000 merchants in the Benelux. YouLend has also announced recent deals with JustEat and Paypoint.

Liberis, the second player in the European market, has been bought by Qred, a Swedish bank. We can expect to see Liberis widening its embedded finance offer to include more conventional banking products which will be attractive to PSPs looking to offer more conventional loans or invoice financing.

Meanwhile, in Czechia, Flowpay – one of the rare MCA vendors not based in London – is providing financing through a partnership with Teya.

SoftPOS

Lloyds Bank in the UK is embedding Stripe’s SoftPOS within its business banking app. Called Lloyds Connect, transactions are 1.5% + 20p. In this video, a plumber explains that taking card payments on the spot beats chasing clients for invoices. “It makes a very uncomfortable situation, very comfortable,” he says. Standard Stripe POS terminals are also available. 

The plumber is in a more comfortable position than Fiserv. With the Stripe partnership, Lloyds has split its payment acceptance proposition. Below £100K card turnover, customers are directed to Stripe product. Above the threshold, it’s still Lloyds Cardnet, the bank’s JV with Fiserv. Customers can’t apply for Lloyds Connect if they are already clients of Lloyds Cardnet, the bank’s JV with Fiserv, presumably due to non-compete agreements between the partners.

Cash

Public policy sometimes moves contradictory directions regarding cash. On the one hand, central bankers praise its role in financial resilience and politicians understand its role in financial inclusion. On the other, everyone knows that cash goes hand in glove with tax avoidance and money laundering.

Germany is a case in point. The government of Berlin wants to make card acceptance mandatory“I can’t think of any other reason why someone insists on cash payment than wanting to work past the tax,” said the Christian Democrat leader. But when the sole ATM failed at a German seaside resort, the Mayor pleaded with visitors to bring their own cash.

But Europeans are voting with their feet. LINK, the UK’s ATM network, maintains detailed research of cash usage which shows a recent quite rapid decline. More people and merchants are going wholly cash free. 10% of people say they never use cash and 23% of retailers only accept digital money.

The % of UK adult population that have used cash to pay for something in the past two weeks 2022-2026 Source: LINK

Crypto

140 banks, card schemes, PSPs and technology providers have formed Open Standardto launch a stablecoin called OUSD. This is a big move and one that should both legitimise and simplify this rather complicated new form of money. Among the founders are Adyen, Checkout, Fiserv, Nuvei, Shopify and Worldline. Open Standard’s USP will be its positioning as neutral infrastructure, not a profit machine. You won’t be surprised to learn that Simon Taylor is very excited about this.

No matter who issues the coins, their primary use case is financial plumbing not retail customer experience. Visa’s President said recently: “Stablecoins are unlikely to become widely used for paying for goods and services in stores in the foreseeable future.”

This confirms data from the US Fed which shows little or no use of crypto currencies – stable or unstable – by consumers.

In other news

This is not an April fool. Block – the parent of Square – has launched Cash App Wand. For $25 you can embed your card credentials in a piece of cheap moulded plastic. Tap to pay at any contactless terminal and feel like Harry Potter.

Cash App Wand

Cashapp Wand from Block

Paris has finally agreed to a €140m investment to implement contactless ticketing and payments on public transport. There’s no rush. It will take until 2030 to roll out the whole network. It’s a different model to London. Paris will still encourage you to use the closed-loop Navigo cards. Bank cards (Visa, Mastercard or Carte Bancaire) will be more expensive. Worldline will be processing the transactions.

A timely report from KAE shows that, if you want to keep your customers, service and pricing is more important than product. Where merchants do need new capability, they are happy to pay. There’s no need to bundle the latest features with today’s standard price plan.

The average restaurant tip in the US is almost 20% according to data from Toast. This American habit is coming to Europe fast, thanks to the proliferation of US hospitality software.

In Italy, banks have voluntarily agreed to reduce processing fees for sub €30 transactions for small merchants with turnover less than €400,000.

FXC has listed all the payment sponsorships at the World Cup. There are more than you’d think.

PayPal has axed PayPal ventures. I’ve never been convinced by corporate VCs. If a business has spare cash, give to the shareholders and let them decide what to invest in.

And finally

The original stablecoin is a Scottish pound. These are backed 1:1 with English banknotes but can sometimes be difficult to spend south of the border. But I’ve never seen them discounted before. This FX bureau will give you 20% less for a Scottish pound than an English one.

Photo credit: Ron Delvano

My investments

I’ve made small investments in three exciting payment start-ups. I’ve included these for full disclosure but let me know if you’d like an introduction.

  • 1-CP – based in Frankfurt, 1-CP is the “Corporate PayPal” that brings B2B functions into merchants’ B2C checkouts.
  • Equali – reconciliation and accounting automation for payments
  • Inqyre – AI orchestration for merchant onboarding in payments

Where to find me

I’ll be at the Fintech Drinks in London on 16 July and at the EPSM event in Athens on 22 October.

Get in touch

If you’re looking for a board advisor, non-executive director or speaker/moderator at a company event or conference, get in touch. 

Book an online meeting or reach me the old-fashioned way: geoff@barracloughandco.com, +44 7808 142102.